[ncdnhc-discuss] RE: [nc-str] Proposal for major ICANN reform

[Raul Echeberria]

At 07:06 25/02/02 -0500, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>I am assuming that this should be the main focus of our call Monday. 
>however, Philip, given it's impact, it seems to me that the full NC will 
>want to be engaged in its considerations and implications.  Marilyn


It is the evidence that the Terms of References of this TF were wrong. The 
TF (previously  to I join it) defined a way to work. The TF was focused in 
analyzing the ALSC proposal instead of promote among its members the 
discussion about the ICANN's structure.

While we discussed (with a very low participation) with this limited scope, 
the reality outside this TF changed very much. It was a real waste of time.

I think that the NC should discuss and take decisions in relation with the 
justification of this Task Force and this current objectives.

Best Regards,

Raul



--
Este e-mail ha sido chequeado de virus y
contenido peligroso por MailScanner
el cual no detecto ninguna anomalia

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20020225/435f24ec/attachment.html>