[ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [nc-whois] Both Transfers and WHOIS Reports are pos...

[KathrynKL at aol.com]

Danny:
The point that you raise is a very good one, and I have written privately to 
Sarah about it.  So let me ask:    To all in NCC, if you have already 
submitted comments to the WHOIS Task Force, could you tell us (preferably the 
whole NCC) 
a) your comments (in brief) 
b) whether they were incorporated into the WHOIS Task Force report and 
c) what remains to be done to better protect privacy.

Comments at this stage of the game will be far more successful if we (even 
new commenters) can build upon the ideas and proposals of those who have 
already participated.

With thanks to all who have spent worked on this to date, 
Kathy Kleiman 


> you wrote:  "Like telephone numbers, we need an "unlisted" version of the 
> WHOIS registration for noncommercial domain name registrants.  But I did 
> not see this idea reflected in the WHOIS report."
> 
> Please note that I submitted a similar proposal to the Task Force in late 
> August at 
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-whois/Arc00/msg00015.html
> 
> One has to wonder if the Task Force ever reads and discusses these 
> comments, or if they only go through the motions of listing the comments 
> tendered...


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20021202/0fa67498/attachment-0001.html>