[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN Reform: Role of ITU

[Jefsey Morfin]

On 19:40 30/04/02, Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM said:
>Dear James,
>do you think of a body better than ICANN able to restrain the ITU from 
>overreaching?
>Alejandro Pisanty

yes. the ICANN + USG ccTLDs + EU + Open Roots + New.Net + ISSN ...  for 
naming, ie all the namespaces
yes. the IP registries + ICANN for the adressing
yes. the ICANN + IETF + IAB + MS + Verisign + ETSI .... for protocols
yes. GAC + Consumers organizations + .... and *not* the ICANN for the 
mission creep
yes. the ICANN without the ITU/T for the Legacy Registries and Registrar 
management

Overreaching is not possible in a concertation committtee under a 
rotational chair. Ask the people who are used to it, like G8. It is 
possible when you are two. Not when you are many.

ICANN is the USG's organization to manage their Jon Postel's legacy. Its 
problem is to have continued Jon Postel's control instead of concerting. 
The risk of the ITU/T which is built to organise the Telecoms world is that 
they want to better our world. Either the ICANN wants to make a contract 
with the ITU/T and it will be swallowed. Or we builds the Internet world 
together, and the ITU/T will proceed in peace with us.

The ITU/T has been called in by Lynn when he called for the Govs. The only 
problem for Lynn is that the Govs will come, but not the money.
jfc
-------------- next part --------------

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02