[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN Reform: Role of ITU
Marc Schneiders
marc at fuchsia.bijt.net
Tue Apr 30 17:28:18 CEST 2002
I strongly support this position.
--
Marc Schneiders
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, at 20:36 [=GMT+0900], Adam Peake wrote:
> Following is taken from George Sadowsky's comments on ICANN reform --
> I strongly support George's comment regarding the ITU and ICANN and
> hope the constituency will agree.
>
>
> <http://forum.icann.org/reform-comments/general/msg00064.html> (quote
> under point 3.)
>
> Those who look to the ITU as a panacea for ICANN's problems are
> misguided. The ITU is a very important organization that has
> contributed and continues to contribute substantially to the
> evolution of international communication. It is also an
> international bureaucracy, and its policies are influenced by the
> member countries on their Board of Directors. Positions are often
> influenced by the dominant telephone carrier in those countries,
> which generally has little interest in seeing the Internet prosper.
> It may be that the ITU is the ultimate home for Internet governance
> and administration, but this can only occur after the ITU (or any
> other potential home organization) demonstrates a thorough
> understanding of the Internet as a technology and as a culture, and
> there is solid evidence of a determination to maximize the power and
> reach of this technology. This will not happen overnight.
>
> (end quote)
>
> I do not support any role increased role for the ITU in ICANN and
> hope our names council representatives will begin to reflect this
> view in future names council discussions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam Peake
> GLOCOM Tokyo
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list