[ncdnhc-discuss] specific test changes for Latest NC draft
KathrynKL at aol.com
KathrynKL at aol.com
Tue Apr 23 18:14:04 CEST 2002
I strongly support the inclusion of these well-crafted words (and important
concepts) in the Names Council statement. Do others agree?
Kathy Kleiman
Jamie Love wrote:
>
> "ICANN should develop a non-exhaustive list of things that ICANN does not
> do." (since the current "we do" statment is so broad).
>
> "Whereever possible, ICANN should avoid centralization of policy making,
> deferring to regional or national policy makers on issues that do not
> require centralized and uniform policies. ICANN need not control every
> policy decision on the DNS system, particularly those concerning
> authorization of new TLDs, where ICANN can simply defer to national or
> regional decision makers, and coordinate issues that truly require global
> coordination, such as uniqueness of TLD strings.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20020423/1109da2e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list