[ncdnhc-discuss] specific test changes for Latest NC draft

KathrynKL at aol.com KathrynKL at aol.com
Tue Apr 23 18:14:04 CEST 2002


I strongly support the inclusion of these well-crafted words (and important 
concepts) in the Names Council statement.   Do others agree?

Kathy Kleiman

Jamie Love wrote:

> 
> "ICANN should develop a non-exhaustive list of things that ICANN does not
> do."  (since the current "we do" statment is so broad).
> 
> "Whereever possible, ICANN should avoid centralization of policy making,
> deferring to regional or national policy makers on issues that do not
> require centralized and uniform policies.  ICANN need not control every
> policy decision on the DNS system, particularly those concerning
> authorization of new TLDs, where ICANN can simply defer to national or
> regional decision makers, and coordinate issues that truly require global
> coordination, such as uniqueness of TLD strings.
> 
>          

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20020423/1109da2e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list