[ncdnhc-discuss] ITU on ICANN

[James Love]

Dave, rather than hand out insults, tell me what you think limits
ICANN's boundaries.   I think there is very little, other than a
majority vote of the board of directors.     Try to deal with the
substantive questions.

Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: "James Love" <love at cptech.org>
Cc: "ncc" <discuss at icann-ncc.org>; "Andrew McLaughlin"
<mclaughlin at pobox.com>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] ITU on ICANN


> At 03:43 PM 4/15/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
> >----- Dave Crocker Said -----
> > > The "boundary issue" is already formalized.
> >    Where is this formalized?
>
>
> Presumably, someone who is claiming that there needs to be an effort
to
> protect against expanded scope has bothered to read ICANN formal
documents,
> to ensure that those strictures are not already present.
>
> Alas, it appears that you are not even familiar with the ICANN
articles of
> incorporation, nevermind derivative ICANN documents.
>
> d/
>
> ----------
> Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>