[ncdnhc-discuss] No new LA agenda

[Rob Courtney]

At 9:56 AM -0300 9/28/01, Raul Echeberria wrote:
>Dear friends:
>
>I support the inclusion of the topics proposed by the Staff in the 
>ICANN's agenda, probably in the Marina del Rey meeting, in a 
>specific meeting and/or in one or more focused email lists. Really 
>they are interesting issues and we have to deal with them, .. but 
>ICANN have a lot of important issues to resolve in its November's 
>meeting and those should not be postponed.
>
>The meeting should be organized either in LA or in another city if 
>go to USA is complex for an important number of persons, but ICANN 
>should not postpone its agenda.
>
>I purpose to go ahead with he organization of our constituency 
>meeting in Los Angeles (if there are not any changes related with 
>the meeting's place) and go to the Name council with the position to 
>keep all the planned activities. If there are more issues to include 
>in the Name Council or in the constituency's meetings it means 
>simply that the Name Council or our constituency should have a 
>longer meeting.
>

I strongly agree with Raul here. It's good for ICANN to spend some 
time on technical/security discussions, but we shouldn't let that 
discussion derail others.

Maybe we could delay the finalization of the NCDNHC agenda until a 
bit closer to the meeting? That would give us some flexibility.

r