[ncdnhc-discuss] DNSO Board election, NCC support who?

[Jefsey Morfin]

Dear Michael,
I am surprised of this absolute "9" demand.
IMHO the correct position is half to SOs/half to @large plus 1 to Staff.
There is a proposition for 6 to SOs, 5 to ccTLD, 9 to @large and 1 to Staff.
Do you support that?

Jesey Morfin




On 01:57 09/09/01, Gendron, Michael (MIS) said:
>I concur.  IMHO, The 9 At Large director seats is an issue that is
>tantamount to having a successful ICANN.
>
>Michael
>
>Michael Gendron.. Ph.D.
>Associate Professor
>School of Business
>CCSU
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From:   Milton Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu]
>Sent:   Saturday, September 08, 2001 9:52 AM
>To:     discuss at icann-ncc.org; raul at inia.org.uy
>Subject:        Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] DNSO Board election, NCC support who?
>
>This discussion is way too late.
>I have trouble voting for Amadeu because
>he does not support 9 at-large directors.
>
> >>> Raul Echeberria <raul at inia.org.uy> 09/08/01 09:44 AM >>>
>At 10:29 PM 8/09/01 +0900, Adam Peake wrote:
> >There hasn't been any discussion of who the NCC should support in the
> >upcoming election.
> >
> >My support is for Amadeu Abril i Abril.
>
>I agree with you. He is a hard worker and a reasonable person.
>Is more than many people in ICANN can offer us.
>
>He has my vote (symbolic) .
>
>Raul.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss