[ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces

Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales vany at sdnp.org.pa
Thu Oct 25 15:42:33 CEST 2001


Hi Adam:

--- Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> >Adam:
> >As much as I appreciate your willingness to make
> >comments (and agree with the comments you make)
> 
> Milton, thanks,  Comments sent.
> 
> It's tough work following these closed task forces,
> waiting for the 
> Names Council to allow us in...
> 
> >it is not very realistic for you to expect NC
> members
> >to go through the unnecessary and wholly redundant
> >process of forwarding everyone's emails to another
> >address.
> 
> Would it be unrealistic to ask that you inform us of
> public comment 
> deadlines and where we should send comments to -- or
> have the DNSO 
> secretariat do it for you.  The DNSO website could
> be more helpful in 
> providing information about approaching deadlines.

I am totally agree with you.  DNSO Secretariat should take care not only
to send to the GA and to NC announcements.  
All also should be sent to the constituency list.  
In the DNSO website informes about the Public Commets but it is not
informative about deadlines.  I will propose this be included too.

> Coordinating constituency responses may not be a bad
> idea.

I am totally agree that the NCDNHC must coordinate our responses in this
subject.  In a previoius e-mail I proposed a series of questions
in order to be answered by means of voting on every question.  

I propose now that in order to coordinate our responses, to organize a
voting on every paragraph by separate of the document of .ORG that is
being right now for public comments, in order to know the orientation of
the NCDNHC official position, since still doesn't exists official
position of the NCDNHC.

What all of you think?

Best Regards
Vany


> 
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >Here is the relevant info for submitting comments:
> >Review TF - public comments open 11 Oct 2001
> >Review Report
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011010.NCreview-report.html
> >E-mail address for public comments
> comments-review at dnso.org
> >Archives
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-review/Arc01/
> >
> >Just add comments-review at dnso.org into your
> >email and send it directly to DNSO.
> >
> >--MM
> >
> >>>>  Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> 10/24/01 07:44AM
> >>>
> >http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011011.NCteleconf-minutes.html
> >
> >>NC Task Forces
> >>
> >>-NC review interim report: Philip Sheppard said
> that this report was
> >>now being circulated for public comment until
> October 28 when the TF
> >>would look at the comments and produce the final
> report to be
> >>submitted to the NC on November 4 2001.
> >
> >
> >My comment:
> >
> >The task force system should be abolished and all
> DNSO policy making
> >conducted through the open processes: working
> groups.
> >
> >Best I remember there was no support for the
> creation of these small
> >closed Names Council driven "task forces" in the
> public DNSO review.
> >The DNSO working group D (Bret Fausett) did not
> recommend the
> >adoption of these closed and controlled groups.
> >
> >- - - -
> >
> >Perhaps other NCC members will have comments.
> >
> >Name Council representatives: could you please make
> sure all
> >constituency member comments are forwarded to the
> Council before Oct
> >28.
> >
> >It would also be helpful if you could try to give
> the constituency
> >notice of comment deadlines and similar. If keeping
> track of key
> >dates is difficult for you perhaps you could ask
> the DNSO secretariat
> >to keep a timetable and just forward that
> periodically to the list
> >(announcements?)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Adam
> >
> >Adam Peake
> >GLOCOM Tokyo
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discuss mailing list
> >Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> >http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discuss mailing list
> >Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> >http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany at sdnp.org.pa



More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list