[ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces

[Adam Peake]

>Adam:
>As much as I appreciate your willingness to make
>comments (and agree with the comments you make)

Milton, thanks,  Comments sent.

It's tough work following these closed task forces, waiting for the 
Names Council to allow us in...

>it is not very realistic for you to expect NC members
>to go through the unnecessary and wholly redundant
>process of forwarding everyone's emails to another
>address.

Would it be unrealistic to ask that you inform us of public comment 
deadlines and where we should send comments to -- or have the DNSO 
secretariat do it for you.  The DNSO website could be more helpful in 
providing information about approaching deadlines.

Coordinating constituency responses may not be a bad idea.

Adam





>Here is the relevant info for submitting comments:
>Review TF - public comments open 11 Oct 2001
>Review Report http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011010.NCreview-report.html
>E-mail address for public comments comments-review at dnso.org
>Archives http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-review/Arc01/
>
>Just add comments-review at dnso.org into your
>email and send it directly to DNSO.
>
>--MM
>
>>>>  Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> 10/24/01 07:44AM >>>
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011011.NCteleconf-minutes.html
>
>>NC Task Forces
>>
>>-NC review interim report: Philip Sheppard said that this report was
>>now being circulated for public comment until October 28 when the TF
>>would look at the comments and produce the final report to be
>>submitted to the NC on November 4 2001.
>
>
>My comment:
>
>The task force system should be abolished and all DNSO policy making
>conducted through the open processes: working groups.
>
>Best I remember there was no support for the creation of these small
>closed Names Council driven "task forces" in the public DNSO review.
>The DNSO working group D (Bret Fausett) did not recommend the
>adoption of these closed and controlled groups.
>
>- - - -
>
>Perhaps other NCC members will have comments.
>
>Name Council representatives: could you please make sure all
>constituency member comments are forwarded to the Council before Oct
>28.
>
>It would also be helpful if you could try to give the constituency
>notice of comment deadlines and similar. If keeping track of key
>dates is difficult for you perhaps you could ask the DNSO secretariat
>to keep a timetable and just forward that periodically to the list
>(announcements?)
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>
>Adam Peake
>GLOCOM Tokyo
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss