[ncdnhc-discuss] U.S. Congress plans hearings for .kidsproposal
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
vany at sdnp.org.pa
Thu Oct 25 02:35:15 CEST 2001
Hi Dany, Adam and all:
--- Dany Vandromme <vandrome at renater.fr> wrote:
> Adam Peake wrote:
> >
> > If there's to be a .kids, then as a proof of
> concept and as a
> > compromise (sounds like Markey and Shimkus will
> not give up easily on
> > this) it should be tried as a second level under
> .us rather than as a
> > global TLD.
> >
> > As a TLD forced on the world by two US politicians
> .kids is a bad
> > idea. Under .us, I personally, as a non US
> citizen, don't feel I have
> > any right to object, and the proof of concept
> might be useful.
> >
> > (fwiw)
> >
> > Adam
> -
> I fully agree with Adam. ICANN role is not to solve
> US problems. I would
> not think that US Congressmen should be allowed to
> influence TLD process
> at all.
> As a SLD, why not, as far as it remains a US
> concern. But Proof of
> Concept will be useful.
> Dany
> -
I fully also agree with Adam and Dany in all comments they have done.
Also I want to add that a TLD as .KIDS should be the product of a
worldwide research of a series of facts regarding childrens online,
including economical, social, cultural, educational, recreational,
security amongs many others characteristics that a .KIDS Registry might
take care, and should be a work in team with the relevant organizations
that are children oriented including governmental organizations, since
the target are one of the must vulnerable public of Internet: The
Childrens.
Best Regards
Vany
--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail: vany at sdnp.org.pa
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list