[ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Wed Oct 24 13:44:24 CEST 2001
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011011.NCteleconf-minutes.html
>NC Task Forces
>
>-NC review interim report: Philip Sheppard said that this report was
>now being circulated for public comment until October 28 when the TF
>would look at the comments and produce the final report to be
>submitted to the NC on November 4 2001.
My comment:
The task force system should be abolished and all DNSO policy making
conducted through the open processes: working groups.
Best I remember there was no support for the creation of these small
closed Names Council driven "task forces" in the public DNSO review.
The DNSO working group D (Bret Fausett) did not recommend the
adoption of these closed and controlled groups.
- - - -
Perhaps other NCC members will have comments.
Name Council representatives: could you please make sure all
constituency member comments are forwarded to the Council before Oct
28.
It would also be helpful if you could try to give the constituency
notice of comment deadlines and similar. If keeping track of key
dates is difficult for you perhaps you could ask the DNSO secretariat
to keep a timetable and just forward that periodically to the list
(announcements?)
Thanks,
Adam
Adam Peake
GLOCOM Tokyo
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list