[ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces

Adam Peake ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Wed Oct 24 13:44:24 CEST 2001


http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011011.NCteleconf-minutes.html

>NC Task Forces
>
>-NC review interim report: Philip Sheppard said that this report was
>now being circulated for public comment until October 28 when the TF
>would look at the comments and produce the final report to be
>submitted to the NC on November 4 2001.


My comment:

The task force system should be abolished and all DNSO policy making 
conducted through the open processes: working groups.

Best I remember there was no support for the creation of these small 
closed Names Council driven "task forces" in the public DNSO review. 
The DNSO working group D (Bret Fausett) did not recommend the 
adoption of these closed and controlled groups.

- - - -

Perhaps other NCC members will have comments.

Name Council representatives: could you please make sure all 
constituency member comments are forwarded to the Council before Oct 
28.

It would also be helpful if you could try to give the constituency 
notice of comment deadlines and similar. If keeping track of key 
dates is difficult for you perhaps you could ask the DNSO secretariat 
to keep a timetable and just forward that periodically to the list 
(announcements?)

Thanks,

Adam

Adam Peake
GLOCOM Tokyo



More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list