[ncdnhc-discuss] Revised security resolution

[Jim Fleming]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: "Chun Eung Hwi" <ehchun at peacenet.or.kr>
Cc: <discuss at icann-ncc.org>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Revised security resolution


>
> >--> The single DNS root leads to excessive administrative (not technical)
> >centralization.
>
> Administrative centralization for a registry is required by the technical
> nature of the DNS administered.  Hence the requirement for centralized
> registry administration is technical.
>
> As to whether it is "excessive":  That is an emotional term and it is not
> based on any metric.  Given that there currently exists no technically
> credible way to do anything other than centralization, it can be strongly
> argued that centralized registry administration is exactly the right
> amount.  Not too little.  Not too much.
>

"ICANN represents that it has no authority to implement new TLDs"
http://www.icann.org/tlds/correspondence/esi-v-icann-13nov00.htm


RFC-2001-07-01-000 IPv8 Expansion of Proof of Concept TLD Development
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12574.html


Proof of Concept TLD Development...and Multiple TLD Clusters
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12215.html

Do you use Windows 2000 or Windows XP ?

Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info
IPv16....One Better !!