[ncdnhc-discuss] ccSO

[Dave Crocker]

At 01:33 AM 12/23/2001 -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
> >>> Kent Crispin <kent at songbird.com> 12/21/01 18:34 PM >>>
> > international forum where non-commercial interests
> > could find common ground in DNS policy. With a ccSO
>
>The NCC has been doing precisely that.

Milton, you need to get out more.

The NCC has no relationship with being an international forum, nor with 
actual non-commercial interests, nor with finding common ground in DNS policy.

That you would pretend otherwise bespeaks of impressively creative pretension.


>  The problem
>is that from the beginning it has been assaulted by fifth-columnists 
>(ICANN consultants, e.g., or agents of ccTLDs).

What a surprise that you would resort to McCarthyist style, as 
usual.  After all, it is always so much easier to impune other's motives 
rather than take responsibility for your own nastiness, unrealistic 
requirements, and rigid refusal to compromise.


>The relevance of this to the ccSO subject:
>if developing country interests recognize the
>failure of DNSO to be a bottom up, fair, effective


>I think that is what this ccSO debate it all about.

yeah.  it could not be anything so simple as the ccTLD folks wishing to 
keep separate from the encrusted waste of time the DNSO has decided to become.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464