[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN committee recommends voting restrictions,fewerAt-Large di rectors

[Milton Mueller]

Chun is absolutely correct. 

Every time we have a vote, whether on line or in person, the
support of the members of this constituency for greater
representation is overwhelmingly supported, whether in
the context of the at-large or the new individuals' 
constituency.

I appeal to the REAL members of the NCDNHC on this list not
to bother to respond or argue with Crocker or Crispin and to 
ignore the "denial" tactics of Alejandro. It is really a waste of
time. They are not interested in exchanging ideas, only in
obstructing our work. Don't encourage them.

>>> Chun Eung Hwi <ehchun at peacenet.or.kr> 08/29/01 05:30AM >>>
Dear Alejandro Pisanty and others,

On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Alejandro Pisanty - CUAED y FQ, UNAM wrote:

> As for consensus in the constituency I beg to differ. This has been a
> divisive issue here and approached with more preestablished views than
> reasoning up to now.

Fact is fact. Please refer to "Resolution on By-Law changes on board
elections" which was adopted in Yokohama.  
(http://ncdnhc.icann-ncc.org/docs/resolution/bylaw.html) If you don't
acknowledge this consensus, what should be the base for our discussion?
What's constituency? If we want to make more constructive discussion, we
should respect for our past decisions. Of course, there could be always
different ideas among people. However, consensus is consensus and personal
idea is personal idea.

 
> As a final note, may I remark that I hope the constituency, which has been
> reduced to a third by the magic wand of changing the list to a new server,
> can discuss this issue *and* the .org which was supposed to be closest to
> our hearts not so long ago. Which maybe defies explanation and maybe not.

Alejandro, it is not magic. It was decided by members. Due to the
protection of privacy, many members refused automatic registration to the
discussion list, so voluntary registration was chosen. And we don't know
how many people have left from this list in the transition process because
we didn't know the exact subscribers' list of the old list - I requested
to get it many times, it was not realised.
Anyway, your suggestion is good, I also agree to focus those two issues.



Chun Eung Hwi
------------------------------------------------------------
Chun Eung Hwi
General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 583-3033
Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667 
Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr   
------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at icann-ncc.org 
http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss