[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN committee recommends voting restrictions, fewer At-Large di rectors

[Chun Eung Hwi]

Dear all,

With respect to the number of at large directors, at least in this
constituency, I think there is some consensus. And so far as those
comments given to this discussion at atlargestudy.org are concerned, it is
very obvious. If somebody has different idea, they can make a comment
there. Therefore, it is unnecessary to kill time for discussing on this
issue. What we shoud explore from now on is how to make a relevant
pressure for getting half of directors from at large member's election.

Regards,

Chun Eung Hwi
------------------------------------------------------------
Chun Eung Hwi
General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 583-3033
Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667 
Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr   
------------------------------------------------------------


On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Dave Crocker wrote:

> At 07:38 AM 8/28/2001, Chris Chiu wrote:
> >It also recommended that the number of At-Large Board
> >members be reduced to 6, despite suggestions from various observers that at
> >least 9 (out of 19) Board members should be publicly elected.
> 
> no doubt it is irrelevant that there were also suggestions "from various 
> observers" that the number be REDUCED.
> 
> as usual, it is far better only to report facts that align with the 
> reporter's preferences (or desire to create a sense of outrage in the 
> reader.)
> 
> d/
> 
> ----------
> Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>