[ncdnhc-discuss] Re: [ncdnhc-adcom] Non-Commercial Supporting Organization

[Dany Vandromme]

Milton Mueller wrote:
> 
> YJ:
> I don't think we have the political support or financial clout to
> create our own SO.
> 
> The ccTLDs could do it because they prepared for a long
> time and they have budget leverage over ICANN. They also
> have stronger relations with the governments of their
> countries.
> 
> I agree with your analysis of the problem, but I don't think
> a new SO is a solution. Not that it's a bad idea, but it's just
> not feasible at the moment.
> 
> A better alternative is to concentrate on the ORG registry.
> 
> >>> "YJ Park" <yjpark at myepark.com> 08/17/01 08:38AM >>>
> 
> August. 17, 2001
> 
> YJ Park
> 
>                                     Resolution for
> Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Supporting Organization
> 
> The current Non-Commercial Domain Names Holders Constituency
> of Domain Names Supporting Organization has been recognized by
> the ICANN Board in Santiago in August ICANN meeting, 2000.
> 
> Since then, non-commercial domain names holders constituency
> has been encountering an endless challenge in the DNSO. It is always
> outnumbered in DNSO decision-making process by the majority votes.
> 
> It turned out that it is almost impossible for Non-commercial domain
> name holders constituency to address its concerns which has been
> many times quite different from the other constituencies especially
> commercial-based constituencies easily to be buried due to innate
> DNSO imbalanced structure, five commercial constituencies,
> Registrar, ISP, IP, Business, gTLD, one non-commercial and ccTLD
> [note1], which has been pointed out by WG-Review report earlier this
> year and by At-Large Study Committee process, recently.
> 
> On the other hand, there have been concerns expressed by NCDNHC
> members that there are too diverse interests mixed in this same
> group under the name of non-commercial domain names holders
> constituency, which is too vague to define its common ground and too
> broad to reach consensus many times within the constituency: There
> are education and research organizations, civil society groups,
> consumer groups, activist groups for citizens, non-commercial
> purpose lobbyist groups etc..
> 
> Therefore, the non-commercial domain name holders constituency
> of the DNSO hereby declare its withdrawl from DNSO in Montevideo
> and its new formation of Non-Commercial Domain Names Holders
> Supporting Organization, NCSO.
> 
> [Note1] ccTLD is difficult to categorize whether it is commercial or
> non-commercial in a simple way.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Adcom mailing list
> Adcom at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/adcom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Adcom mailing list
> Adcom at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/adcom

I agree with Milton
Dany
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme at renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------