[Membership-affairs] {SPAM} Re: [NCUC-EC] point on the membership survey

[Walid AL-SAQAF]

Thanks Amr,

This is quite useful. I would rather keep all WGs even if you aren't sure
are active. I'll just change the question than to working groups that are
related to GNSO so as to remain factually correct. As for the name of the
review committee. That's the way it appears on the official page here:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/projects-list.pdf. But upon checking the
link, it looks like the name you provide is the active one. So it makes
sense to change it to that name.



Sincerely,

Walid

-----------------

Walid Al-Saqaf, PhD

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>  On Feb 23, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Walid AL-SAQAF <wsaqaf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
>    *Just so we don't spend too much more time on this, could you do me a
> favor and point out that the below active list is what we want to include
> in the survey? Is there anything else missing, incorrect, or needs removal?*
>
>  *GNSO Working Groups:*
>
>
>    1.
> *Curative Rights Protections for IGO/INGOs (IGO-INGO-CRP) *
>
>     Active
>
>
>    1.
> *Discussion Group – New gTLD Subsequent Rounds (ngTLDs-DG) *
>
>     Active
>
>
>    1.
> *GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement (GAC-GNSO-CG) *
>
>     This is Active, and although its charter was adopted by the GNSO
> council and the GAC, it isn't a GNSO WG per se. Just a consultation group
> consisting of some GNSO councillors and GAC members. It isn’t open to
> participation/membership.
>
>
>    1.
> *Geo Regions Review Community-wide WG *
>
>     Not sure if this is active, or not. I don’t believe it is. It
> submitted a draft final report years ago, but I don’t know if this was
> followed up, or not.
>
>
>    1.
> *GNSO Data & Metrics for Policy Making WG *
>
>     Active
>
>
>    1.
> *GNSO PDP Improvements Discussion Group (PDP-IMPR) *
>
>     I’m not aware of this being active. I might have missed it.
>
>
>    1.
> *GNSO Review Committee (REVIEW) *
>
>     Not sure what this is, but you may mean the GNSO Review Working Party
> (
>
>
>    1.
> *GNSO Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) *
>
>     Not a GNSO WG, but a standing committee chartered by the GNSO Council.
>
>
>    1.
> *Policy & Implementation WG (POLIMP) *
>
>     Active
>
>
>    1.
> *RAA Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues WG (PPSAI) *
>
>     Active
>
>
>    1. *Translation/Transliteration of Internationalized Registration Data
>    WG (T&T)*
>
>     Active
>
>  I don’t know wether or not you want to point out that numbers 1, 10 and
> 11 are GNSO PDP working groups, as opposed to 5 and 9 that are GNSO
> (non-PDP) working groups.
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  Amr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/membership-affairs/attachments/20150223/5a6c0067/attachment-0002.html>