[NCUC E-team] [NCSG-Discuss] New member admission process and member databases

[Brenden Kuerbis]

Absolutely, should be a requirement of any custom or off-the-shelf solution
implemented.

-- B

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> agree completely.
>
> avri
>
> On 22-Sep-14 04:40, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > Which brings me to one technical issue I've been harping about
> > to various people privately for some time: I see little point
> > in maintaining three distinct member databases, when two
> > are (required to be) subsets of the third. It would be much
> > easier to maintain just NCSG member database and have
> > constituency membership there as an attribute
> > (of course still leaving it up to each constituency to
> > decide who they accept as their members, they just would
> > not need to maintain members' contact info &c separately).
> > This would make for an easy workflow for the three ECs,
> > one place for members to check their membership details, &c.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/attachments/20140922/54a65c9d/attachment.html>