[NCUC E-team] Members without good email

[Brenden Kuerbis]

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info
> wrote:

> On Nov 07 15:38, William Drake (wjdrake at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > >> If someone rotates out of being an org’s rep I guess it’s not
> > >> problematic for them to be individual members, but they most
> > >> certainly shouldn’t be getting two ballots. Please tell me they
> > >> haven’t!
> > >
> > > Of course they have, and that has also been extensively
> > > discussed last year: there's nothing in the charter
> > > that'd allow depriving them of either ballot.
> > > (Ditto for NCSG, btw.)
> >
> > Sorry, I’m spread a bit thin at the moment and don’t recall the
> > conversation about this last year, but as you do great.
>
> See, e.g.,
>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/2013-March/000283.html
>
> > > On Nov 7, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <
> ncuc at TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, it has to be enforced as long as we use ICANN's voting software,
> > > which does enforce it (which is also the reason I put the restriction
> > > in NCUC member database as well).
>
> > So then it’s not really an issue other than that our member count is
> > inflated by three individuals…?
>
> Not even that, at least I think they *should* be counted twice:
> organization's membership is independent of who its representative is
> and should counted independently of that, no?
>

Yes, I agree.  And it is represented that way on the members page.



> The only problem I see is technical, how to get ballots to them
> when the software requires distinct email addresses.
>
>
Right.




> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> E-team mailing list
> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/attachments/20141107/be1d462f/attachment-0002.html>