[NCUC E-team] Question

William Drake wjdrake at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 08:16:10 CET 2014


Thanks much Tapani, this is really helpful.

Bill

> On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:18:27PM -0500, Brenden Kuerbis (bkuerbis at gmail.com) wrote:
> 
>> Date of last reply makes sense to me.
> 
> OK, done.
> 
> Instead of adding a new field in the ncucers table I added a new table
> ncucer_verified, which contains just verification timestamps (easier
> to do and less likely to break anything else).
> 
> Last year's timestamps are not available (possibly could be recovered
> from Apache logs but not worth it), instead I marked all who were
> confirmed last year as 1 November 2013, and the new ones just added as
> 1 October 2014. For the next round we should get exact timestamps.
> 
> It's as yet completely untested though.
> 
> Maryam, you can test it with my data if you like, but don't do more
> until I verify that it works (tomorrow).
> 
> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> E-team mailing list
> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team





More information about the E-team mailing list