[NCUC E-team] Member list name
Avri Doria
avri at ella.com
Wed Jan 23 15:34:23 CET 2013
I remain against the use of discuss.
I realize I am in a minority, maybe of one. But I think it is a mistake.
avri
----- Reply message -----
From: "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
To: <e-team at lists.ncuc.org>
Subject: [NCUC E-team] Member list name
Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 09:10
On Jan 23 13:38, William Drake (william.drake at uzh.ch) wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Edward Morris <edward.morris at ALUMNI.USC.EDU> wrote:
> > I'd still prefer a simple discuss-NCUC list
> Me too. [...] "Discuss" captures what they'll actually be using the
> lists for, both of them.
Agreed. While I don't have a really strong view here,
I could live with "work" or "members", but
"discuss" is the best suggestion I've heard so far.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
E-team mailing list
E-team at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/attachments/20130123/6d765897/attachment.html>
More information about the E-team
mailing list