[NCUC E-team] Member list name

Avri Doria avri at ella.com
Wed Jan 23 15:34:23 CET 2013


I remain against the use of discuss. 
I realize I am in a minority, maybe of one. But I think it  is a mistake. 

avri

----- Reply message -----
From: "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
To: <e-team at lists.ncuc.org>
Subject: [NCUC E-team] Member list name
Date: Wed, Jan 23, 2013 09:10


On Jan 23 13:38, William Drake (william.drake at uzh.ch) wrote:

> On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Edward Morris <edward.morris at ALUMNI.USC.EDU> wrote:
> >  I'd still prefer a simple discuss-NCUC list

> Me too. [...] "Discuss" captures what they'll actually be using the
> lists for, both of them.

Agreed. While I don't have a really strong view here,
I could live with "work" or "members", but
"discuss" is the best suggestion I've heard so far.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
E-team mailing list
E-team at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/attachments/20130123/6d765897/attachment.html>


More information about the E-team mailing list