[NCUC E-team] Website revisions by Constituency Day?

[Brenden Kuerbis]

Tapani,

No worries about these requests, I got it taken care of.

-- B
---------------------------------------
Brenden Kuerbis
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org


On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Brenden Kuerbis
<bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org> wrote:
> While you are in there, query reports of
>
> organizational members by country
>
> and
>
> individual members by country
>
> would be helpful too.
>
> -- B
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Brenden Kuerbis
> <bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org> wrote:
>> Tapani,
>>
>> Could you runa query that provides an organizational membership table
>> or csv similar to what is on the current website?  I.e.,
>>
>> Organizational Members of NCUC (Name, Official Representative)
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Brenden
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Tapani Tarvainen
>> <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
>>
>>> Best data we have is on the new site, it could be imported to Ning
>>> or linked to from there (though then some prettyfication would be nice):
>>> http://ncuc1.ncuc.org/members/
>>>
>>> If you want more data on the members you can use the phppgadmin
>>> viewer account, or let me know what you want and I can create
>>> similar ugly reports (or csv files) easily enough.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> Member Teams (what I'd call them, anyway)
>>>> http://ncuc.org/page/working-teams. This now under Participate
>>>> rather than Governance, which would make more sense to me, but
>>>> anyway:
>>>
>>>> *The first thing that jumps out at me is that in some cases the
>>>> lists of team members are shorter than the actual lists of team list
>>>> subscribers. There's no need to underplay the level of member
>>>> engagement...
>>>
>>>> *Second thing: while some teams have been slow to get going,
>>>> eventually each will have content, activities to report. So why not
>>>> create separate pages for each team, linked to this main page?
>>>> Each could have a one sentence descriptor for now at the top saying
>>>> what the team's about, the list of participants, the link to the
>>>> mailing list, and then any docs/records of activity.
>>>
>>> As a starting point, how about just a link to the mailing list?
>>> Participants can be found there as well (although only as email
>>> addresses rather than names, ugly).
>>>
>>>> *Since there's been no mail yet but we will try to start in the next
>>>> quarter, Tapani would it be possible to rename the team and list
>>>> Bylaws Revision rather than Charter?
>>>
>>> Renaming the charter mailing list you mean? Sure.
>>> For technical reasons there should be no space though, so
>>> it'd have to be either "bylaws" or "bylaws-revision" or similar.
>>> Would "bylaws" be OK? It'd be usable later for interpretation
>>> debates &c after revision is (at least temporarily) done.
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure how I screwed that up
>>>
>>> Maybe because "charter" is what used to be in the Ning site...
>>> (seems to have gone now, presumably thanks to Brenden).
>>>
>>>> *With the old Interest Group pages participants with personal member
>>>> pages would show up in the groups. Is that no longer possible?
>>>
>>> It should be possible once we get the new (Wordpress-based) site
>>> up to speed, but probably not before Beijing.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> E-team mailing list
>>> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
>>>