[Comment-drafters] Week 2: Public comment, background reading

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Sat Dec 16 11:48:56 CET 2017


Hi Rafik

Thanks, that's good to know. I anticipate that during the IGF week it
will be very hard to finalize this - whichever version.
But we'll have more collaborations after 22dec

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Per previous communication with Dina, she is aware about the current draft
> and her plan is that the group work on drafting another one as practice
> anyway.
>
> For NCSG PC, we dont have deadline yet but it is probably better to have a
> final draft asap. The current one drafted by Farell is being edited and
> commented,  and may go through several changes.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> On Dec 16, 2017 7:17 PM, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ayden, we can certainly merge the inputs
> Deadline is 5jan, what is PC NCSG deadline?
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Ayden FĂ©rdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please note that Farell has already written a first draft of a comment on
>> this issue. However, there is still time for you to comment on it and to
>> add
>> your perspective. Here is the Google Doc where he has started drafting a
>> proposed response:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m4NHYQj9uOzS5qMU0z6ZdNhqJa7BRPOuHxJuObpewds/edit
>>
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Comment-drafters] Week 2: Public comment, background reading
>> Local Time: 10 December 2017 2:51 PM
>> UTC Time: 10 December 2017 14:51
>> From: raquino at gmail.com
>> To: comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks Dina for referencing the Diversity comment.
>>
>> Indeed it is a v. important comment for NCUC
>>
>> Rafik was a rapporteur of this group and it had many NCUC members
>>
>> The discussion had a pivotal point on the aspect of skills.
>>
>> How does one define skills as an aspect of diversity?
>>
>> Does this mean different education, professional background or expertise
>> or
>> a mix of all that?
>>
>> Another point where the discussion was heated was assessment of diversity
>> and independence. Is it possible for that to exist? If so, in what form.
>>
>> I'd like to thank all who participated and hope to chime in on the doc
>> soon.
>>
>> Em 10 de dez de 2017 10:41 AM, <comment-drafters-request at lists.ncuc.org>
>> escreveu:
>>
>> Send Comment-drafters mailing list submissions to
>>         comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comment-drafters
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         comment-drafters-request at lists.ncuc.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         comment-drafters-owner at lists.ncuc.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Comment-drafters digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Week 2: Public comment, background reading (Dina Solveig Jalkanen)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 18:34:12 +0200
>> From: Dina Solveig Jalkanen <icann at thomascovenant.org>
>> To: comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
>> Subject: [Comment-drafters] Week 2: Public comment, background reading
>> Message-ID: <42e09bf9-03e2-db62-f8e4-7d83cfcd19b2 at thomascovenant.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> we had a bit of a setback with me being sick, but let's see if we can
>> get back on track.
>>
>> By now you have looked through the public comment(s) of your choice.
>>
>> I have looked through the open comments (opportunities to comment on
>> some ICANN related document) and I think the easiest for all backgrounds
>> to start with and an important one to address is Enhancing
>> Accountability - Recommendations for Diversity.
>>
>> Closing date for the comment is January 5th.
>>
>> So, next:
>>
>> - Read Section III: Relevant Resources:
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/accountability-diversity-2017-10-26-en
>> Make notes for yourself.
>>
>> - Read the existing comment proposal by Farell Folly and comments within
>> the document, this is a good way to see Public Comment being worked on.
>> It is ok to add your suggestions as well.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1m4NHYQj9uOzS5qMU0z6ZdNhqJa7BRPOuHxJuObpewds/edit
>>
>> Next week we shall start writing. Feel free to propose another Open
>> Comment as well. o/
>>
>> Solidarity,
>>
>> thomas
>>
>> --
>> * * *
>> Friendly geek in Amsterdam, happy FSFE and EFF member
>> https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: 0x695BF419.asc
>> Type: application/pgp-keys
>> Size: 460210 bytes
>> Desc: not available
>> URL:
>>
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/comment-drafters/attachments/20171209/61a5d303/attachment.key>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: signature.asc
>> Type: application/pgp-signature
>> Size: 801 bytes
>> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
>> URL:
>>
>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/comment-drafters/attachments/20171209/61a5d303/attachment.sig>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Comment-drafters mailing list
>> Comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comment-drafters
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of Comment-drafters Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1
>> **********************************************
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Comment-drafters mailing list
> Comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comment-drafters
>
>


More information about the Comment-drafters mailing list