[Comment-drafters] Week 2: Public comment, background reading
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Sat Dec 16 11:46:59 CET 2017
Hi,
Per previous communication with Dina, she is aware about the current draft
and her plan is that the group work on drafting another one as practice
anyway.
For NCSG PC, we dont have deadline yet but it is probably better to have a
final draft asap. The current one drafted by Farell is being edited and
commented, and may go through several changes.
Best,
Rafik
On Dec 16, 2017 7:17 PM, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Ayden, we can certainly merge the inputs
Deadline is 5jan, what is PC NCSG deadline?
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Ayden FĂ©rdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please note that Farell has already written a first draft of a comment on
> this issue. However, there is still time for you to comment on it and to
add
> your perspective. Here is the Google Doc where he has started drafting a
> proposed response:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m4NHYQj9uOzS5qMU0z6ZdNhqJa7BR
POuHxJuObpewds/edit
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Comment-drafters] Week 2: Public comment, background reading
> Local Time: 10 December 2017 2:51 PM
> UTC Time: 10 December 2017 14:51
> From: raquino at gmail.com
> To: comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks Dina for referencing the Diversity comment.
>
> Indeed it is a v. important comment for NCUC
>
> Rafik was a rapporteur of this group and it had many NCUC members
>
> The discussion had a pivotal point on the aspect of skills.
>
> How does one define skills as an aspect of diversity?
>
> Does this mean different education, professional background or expertise
or
> a mix of all that?
>
> Another point where the discussion was heated was assessment of diversity
> and independence. Is it possible for that to exist? If so, in what form.
>
> I'd like to thank all who participated and hope to chime in on the doc
soon.
>
> Em 10 de dez de 2017 10:41 AM, <comment-drafters-request at lists.ncuc.org>
> escreveu:
>
> Send Comment-drafters mailing list submissions to
> comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comment-drafters
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> comment-drafters-request at lists.ncuc.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> comment-drafters-owner at lists.ncuc.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Comment-drafters digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Week 2: Public comment, background reading (Dina Solveig Jalkanen)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 18:34:12 +0200
> From: Dina Solveig Jalkanen <icann at thomascovenant.org>
> To: comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
> Subject: [Comment-drafters] Week 2: Public comment, background reading
> Message-ID: <42e09bf9-03e2-db62-f8e4-7d83cfcd19b2 at thomascovenant.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear all,
>
> we had a bit of a setback with me being sick, but let's see if we can
> get back on track.
>
> By now you have looked through the public comment(s) of your choice.
>
> I have looked through the open comments (opportunities to comment on
> some ICANN related document) and I think the easiest for all backgrounds
> to start with and an important one to address is Enhancing
> Accountability - Recommendations for Diversity.
>
> Closing date for the comment is January 5th.
>
> So, next:
>
> - Read Section III: Relevant Resources:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/accountability-
diversity-2017-10-26-en
> Make notes for yourself.
>
> - Read the existing comment proposal by Farell Folly and comments within
> the document, this is a good way to see Public Comment being worked on.
> It is ok to add your suggestions as well.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1m4NHYQj9uOzS5qMU0z6ZdNhqJa7BR
POuHxJuObpewds/edit
>
> Next week we shall start writing. Feel free to propose another Open
> Comment as well. o/
>
> Solidarity,
>
> thomas
>
> --
> * * *
> Friendly geek in Amsterdam, happy FSFE and EFF member
> https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: 0x695BF419.asc
> Type: application/pgp-keys
> Size: 460210 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/comment-drafters/
attachments/20171209/61a5d303/attachment.key>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 801 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL:
> <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/comment-drafters/
attachments/20171209/61a5d303/attachment.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Comment-drafters mailing list
> Comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comment-drafters
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Comment-drafters Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1
> **********************************************
>
>
_______________________________________________
Comment-drafters mailing list
Comment-drafters at lists.ncuc.org
https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comment-drafters
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/comment-drafters/attachments/20171216/187b91d9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Comment-drafters
mailing list