[Oprtf] OPRTF Call | Attendance & Zoom Recordings | Thursday, 15 May 2025

[Hakikur Rahman]

Dear Pedro and All,



I have already placed my availability in the when2meet. As we have discussed and I have mentioned, we can discuss reviewing from I-XI as scheduled. I confirm providing my input to XIII & XIV. See you all in the next meetting.



Best regards,

Hakikur



Dr. Hakikur Rahman 

Professor

International Standard University (ISU)

Bangladesh.

Email: mailto:email at hakik.org

Phone: +880-1987417457 (WhatsApp)



Ex-CEO, BDIX.NET











---- On Sun, 18 May 2025 23:01:36 +0600 Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote ---



This is a kind reminder that our deadline is tomorrow, and we have only the votes of the people who manifested their position in the call. 



We have only two votes in the When2Meet, and, at least for now, the second one cannot be counted because of instructions provided in the call and in the previous message.



I would also like to highlight that, although I'm a great enthusiast of creating new engagement opportunities, if the members of this task force don't have enough time availability, this is not the ideal task to engage with the constituency. When we start the substantial work, if we are not being attentive to the asynchronous tasks and instructions, even one or two people could significantly delay the work of the whole group - and here we have deadlines demanded by the Operating Procedures themselves.



Cordially, 



Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025, 12:16, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <mailto:pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:

Dear OPRTF,



As promised, we have two decisions to make by Monday, May 19th, 23h59 UTC/GMT: (1) Scope of the review and (2) Time and day of the week of our bi-weekly (one meeting every two weeks) reunions. By my rough calculations, we will have three meetings to work all sections.



1) To allow for more flexibility, I'm sending a When2Meet:  https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU. Please complete it by Monday. To those that don't know, we have a quick tutorial here: https://www.when2meet.com/?About

As agreed in the meeting, instead of alternating times, we will check what is the most adequate time and day for the majority and keep it for the following meeting - we will also need to check if the support staff is available on the defined slot. Please do not insert only your preferred time and day of the week, but all the ones you are available.



2) About the scope of our work, we have four alternatives of sections that we will review, which will affect the intensity of our work, considering we will have only 3 meetings to do non-asynchronous work:

Sections I to XI (original scoping of the EC)

Sections I to XI, excluding Section IX

Section I do XI + XIII and XIV

Full review of the OP



I mentioned I'd make a form, but I think it is easier if you answer this email with your vote on each alternative, preferably indicating your reasoning. Those who proposed each of these alternative scopes (Pascal, Hakikur, Oksana) can present their arguments, and others can also present divergent opinions. My vote is to maintain the original scoping of the EC, with the reasoning for each session listed in the Google Docs.



Our next meeting will be to discuss Sections I and II of the Operating Procedures. When you vote, answering this message, please note if you think we should broaden or reduce the scope.



I'll create a Google Docs document only with the sections that we will be working with and share it here by Tuesday (Andrea, could you help me with that?), and we will then start the substantial work directly on the doc (using "Suggestion Mode"), presenting arguments as comments. We will use the meetings to solve and vote on the controversial ones.



If you have any doubt, please let us know.



Cordially,



Pedro de Perdigão Lana
https://www.nic.br/, https://www.gedai.com.br/ Researcher

PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)



Coordination/Board/EC @ https://www.isoc.org.br/, https://www.ncuc.org/ & https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home(ICANN) and https://br.creativecommons.net/.



This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it.







Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025 às 10:50, Andrea Glandon <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:

Hello all, 

 

Please find below the attendance and recordings from the Operating Procedures Review Task Force meeting held on Thursday, 15 May 2025 at 15:00 UTC. 

 

This information is also available on the wiki https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AQDqE

 

Attendees: Atif Aleem, Gabriel Karsan, Hakikur Rahman, Jacob Odame-Baiden, Lily Edinam Botsyoe, Namra Naseer, Oksana Prykhodko, Pascal BEK., Pedro de Perdigão Lana, Stephen Dakyi | ICANN org: Devan
 Reed

 

https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/wkEtogpw755-t00J8Z1X49Cah2zsXk0TKAXZ026pyoYQCQrIpYyRedW-NgS-8OZU3bZ8aDvCDiPg45CD.VVpF62NmBBT-RD8F

https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/g53WZn-PduLIAkiL3-MyMXhX_d50mAtR4BAGz3e0FUh743pwNtwlll6vfniBIA2723Y_fE7UmUqmhHiz.uXBldhdFCzPMUuc2

 

Thanks!

Andrea Glandon

Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 

 



--
 Oprtf mailing list
 mailto:Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
 https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf





Pedro de Perdigão Lana
https://www.nic.br/,  Pesquisador (https://www.gedai.com.br/)

Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),

Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ https://www.isoc.org.br/, https://www.ncuc.org & https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home(ICANN), https://br.creativecommons.net/.



Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro.


--
Oprtf mailing list 
mailto:Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org 
https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/oprtf/attachments/20250520/c0b6fbe7/attachment-0001.htm>