[Oprtf] OPRTF Call | Attendance & Zoom Recordings | Thursday, 15 May 2025

Mon May 19 13:52:51 CEST 2025

Dear OPRTF Team,

Thank you for thoughtful inputs and clear rationale on the initiative.

I fully second my colleaugues Karsan and Lily here for maintaining the
original scoping of the *EC (Sections I to XI)*. In my view it  would
indeed strike the right balance between comprehensiveness and manageability
thorough a focused review across all key areas.

I also completed the When2Meet slot booking on Sunday with my availability
and look forward to finalizing our recurring meeting schedule. I also faced
the same issue as Lily via mobile and had to book through Laptop for a
better interface and ease of use, hoping that the correct slots were
captured 🤞

Look forward to working alongside this team and to contribute meaningfully
to our shared goals.

Best Regards,

Atif.

On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 19:01, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a kind reminder that our deadline is tomorrow, and we have only
> the votes of the people who manifested their position in the call.
>
> We have only two votes in the When2Meet, and, at least for now, the second
> one cannot be counted because of instructions provided in the call and in
> the previous message.
>
> I would also like to highlight that, although I'm a great enthusiast of
> creating new engagement opportunities, if the members of this task force
> don't have enough time availability, this is not the ideal task to engage
> with the constituency. When we start the substantial work, if we are not
> being attentive to the asynchronous tasks and instructions, even one or two
> people could significantly delay the work of the whole group - and here we
> have deadlines demanded by the Operating Procedures themselves.
>
> Cordially,
>
> Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025, 12:16, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Dear OPRTF,
>>
>> As promised, we have two decisions to make by Monday, May 19th, 23h59
>> UTC/GMT: (1) Scope of the review and (2) Time and day of the week of our
>> bi-weekly (one meeting every two weeks) reunions. By my rough calculations,
>> we will have three meetings to work all sections.
>>
>> *1) To allow for more flexibility, I'm sending a When2Meet:
>> https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU
>> <https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU>. Please complete it by Monday. *To
>> those that don't know, we have a quick tutorial here*: *
>> https://www.when2meet.com/?About
>> As agreed in the meeting, instead of alternating times, we will check
>> what is the most adequate time and day for the majority and keep it for the
>> following meeting - we will also need to check if the support staff is
>> available on the defined slot. Please do not insert only your preferred
>> time and day of the week, *but all the ones you are available.*
>>
>> *2) About the scope of our work, we have four alternatives of sections
>> that we will review, which will affect the intensity of our work,
>> considering we will have only 3 meetings to do non-asynchronous work:*
>>
>>    1. *Sections I to XI (original scoping of the EC)*
>>    2. *Sections I to XI, excluding Section IX*
>>    3. *Section I do XI + XIII and XIV*
>>    4. *Full review of the OP*
>>
>> *I mentioned I'd make a form, but I think it is easier if you answer this
>> email with your vote on each alternative, preferably indicating your
>> reasoning. *Those who proposed each of these alternative scopes (Pascal,
>> Hakikur, Oksana) can present their arguments, and others can also present
>> divergent opinions. My vote is to maintain the original scoping of the EC,
>> with the reasoning for each session listed in the Google Docs.
>>
>> Our next meeting will be to discuss Sections I and II of the Operating
>> Procedures. *When you vote, answering this message, please note if you
>> think we should broaden or reduce the scope.*
>>
>> *I'll create a Google Docs document only with the sections that we will
>> be working with and share it here by Tuesday (Andrea, could you help me
>> with that?), and we will then start the substantial work* *directly on
>> the doc (using "Suggestion Mode"), presenting arguments as comments. We
>> will use the meetings to solve and vote on the controversial ones.*
>>
>> If you have any doubt, please let us know.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
>> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
>> mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>> Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025 às 10:50, Andrea Glandon <
>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find below the attendance and recordings from the Operating
>>> Procedures Review Task Force meeting held on Thursday, 15 May 2025 at 15:00
>>> UTC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This information is also available on the wiki here.
>>> <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AQDqE>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Attendees: *Atif Aleem, Gabriel Karsan, Hakikur Rahman, Jacob
>>> Odame-Baiden, Lily Edinam Botsyoe, Namra Naseer, Oksana Prykhodko, Pascal
>>> BEK., Pedro de Perdigão Lana, Stephen Dakyi | ICANN org: Devan Reed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Zoom Replay
>>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/wkEtogpw755-t00J8Z1X49Cah2zsXk0TKAXZ026pyoYQCQrIpYyRedW-NgS-8OZU3bZ8aDvCDiPg45CD.VVpF62NmBBT-RD8F>
>>>
>>> Audio Replay
>>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/g53WZn-PduLIAkiL3-MyMXhX_d50mAtR4BAGz3e0FUh743pwNtwlll6vfniBIA2723Y_fE7UmUqmhHiz.uXBldhdFCzPMUuc2>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> *Andrea Glandon*
>>>
>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>>>
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
> Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC
> Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
> engano, favor responder informando o erro.
> --
> Oprtf mailing list
> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/oprtf/attachments/20250519/7bf59fae/attachment-0001.htm>