[Oprtf] OPRTF Call | Attendance & Zoom Recordings | Thursday, 03 July 2025

Tue Jul 29 13:05:08 CEST 2025

Hi all,

Copying and pasting Wisdom message on NCUC-discuss:

‐-------------

Dear NCUC Members,

In accordance with Section XV, items 8 and 9  ("9. The document shall be
shared via the NCUC-Discuss list with NCUC members and open for comments
and suggestions for a minimum of 14 calendar days"), of the current NCUC
Operating Procedures (September 2017 version
<https://www.ncuc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NCUC-Operating-Procedures-Sept-2017.pdf>),
we are launching the first round of public comment on the proposed
revisions to our Operating Procedures.

*We would like to sincerely thank the NCUC Operating Procedures Review Task
Force (OPRTF), as well as the penholders Pedro de Perdigão and Namra
Naseer, of the NCUC Executive Committee, for their dedicated work on the
document and for successfully completing their part of the process.*

The document under review can be accessed here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qJORoUG229UxqC3PkKpxjc7D9PiZdw_ZM-0oSeu4CDk/edit?tab=t.0

We invite all members of the NCUC community to provide feedback and
suggestions on the proposed updates, helping to shape part of the rules
that guide our constituency by participating in this process, aiming at the
continuous improvement of our community and its institutions.

You may contribute in one or both of the following ways:

·  *Directly in the Google Document* by: (i) adding new comments to suggest
edits or raise concerns; (ii) using the "Like" feature to support existing
comments made by others.

·  *Via the NCUC-members mailing list*, by posting your feedback and
suggestions for discussion.

*This round of Public Comments will be open until August 9th, 23h59 UTC**.*

Following the conclusion of this first round, the NCUC EC will consider the
input received and, if necessary, issue a revised draft for a second round
of comments, as outlined in Section XV (items 10-14) of the Operating
Procedures.

Your participation and opinions are critical to ensuring our procedures
continue to serve the interests of the NCUC’s diverse and global
non-commercial user community, reinforcing mechanisms that guarantee that
our community can keep advancing. Thank you in advance for your time,
insights, and commitment to our shared mission.

Warm regards,
--------------

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
<https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC Brasil
<https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
engano, favor responder informando o erro.

Em ter., 29 de jul. de 2025, 08:02, Oksana Prykhodko <sana.pryhod at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Dear all,
>
> I'm sorry for missing this call and dead-lines - because of health
> problems.
>
> What is the dead-line for public comments?
>
> Kind regards,
> Oksana
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:20 PM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lily!
>>
>> We now entered the phase of public comments from the community, and the
>> OPRTF work is over - as a task force, any task force member can add new
>> comments as a NCUC member in this public comment phase.
>>
>> I'd encourage all OPRTF to continue interacting in the final version of
>> the Google Docs that was published by Wisdom, so we can keep the
>> conversation going (and so you can also contribute to rationales of
>> proposed changes, when people ask in the doc).
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
>> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
>> Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC
>> Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
>> engano, favor responder informando o erro.
>>
>> Em seg., 28 de jul. de 2025, 01:06, Lily Edinam Botsyoe <
>> lilybotsyoe at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Sorry, I’ve been away for a while. Is there brother call or what are the
>>> next steps?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Lily
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 7:10 AM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> Final reminder to leave your comments/rationales/indications of
>>>> controversies that were discussed in, before it goes for public comment
>>>> from our community.
>>>>
>>>> Cordially,
>>>>
>>>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (
>>>> GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
>>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
>>>> Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>>>> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC
>>>> Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>>>> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida
>>>> por engano, favor responder informando o erro.
>>>>
>>>> Em dom., 13 de jul. de 2025, 21:14, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Raymond!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your comments there. However, a few of them (those that
>>>>> suggest text changes before the text goes out for the community) belong to
>>>>> the OPRTF phase that has already ended.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are now signaling what are the controversies that remain (that is
>>>>> why this moment was named like this) and adding rationales, not suggesting
>>>>> any changes to the text - but those changes can be suggested, without any
>>>>> problem, in the Public Comment phase coming up, which is also not
>>>>> restricted to the purple text, because any member can bring up new ideas to
>>>>> any part of the working text.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cordially,
>>>>>
>>>>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>>>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (
>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
>>>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial
>>>>> (UCoimbra),
>>>>> Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>,
>>>>> NCUC <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
>>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC
>>>>> Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>>>>> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida
>>>>> por engano, favor responder informando o erro.
>>>>>
>>>>> Em dom., 13 de jul. de 2025, 19:54, Raymond Mamattah <
>>>>> mamattah.raymond at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Pedro and team,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have made some inputs to the "controversial" portions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Raymond Mamattah
>>>>>> [image: linkedin]
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/raymond-selorm-mamattah/> [image:
>>>>>> facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/selorm.mamattah> [image: twitter]
>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/RMamattah>
>>>>>> Accra, Ghana
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 4:11 PM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear OPRTF,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the final OPRTF version of the Operating Procedures review.
>>>>>>> It took quite a while to check notes, join the docs, and format it all
>>>>>>> together:
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qJORoUG229UxqC3PkKpxjc7D9PiZdw_ZM-0oSeu4CDk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.w3thgepi4brj
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have accepted almost all of the comments that were left in the
>>>>>>> docs and had no indication of being controversial (in the Google Doc or I
>>>>>>> our exchange of emails). This also includes Gabriel's suggestions of
>>>>>>> rewording, since they generally made the text more understandable without
>>>>>>> changing the content.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *I have left in purple the sections where I understood no consensus
>>>>>>> was reached.* As mentioned in the last call, considering some
>>>>>>> points remained controversial after debating it, we decided to leave the
>>>>>>> controversies for the wider community to discuss, instead of the original
>>>>>>> plan of finding a final OPRTF text.
>>>>>>> *Please confirm if we are all okay with that. *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *I would like to ask you to use the following 6 days, until midnight
>>>>>>> UTC on Saturday, July 19th, to check if my understanding is correct and
>>>>>>> flag any other sections that remain controversial and I may have missed. I
>>>>>>> would also request you to add any extra rationale you find important to the
>>>>>>> sections I have already flagged and to the new ones you point out.* @Ken
>>>>>>> Herman <ken at kherman.com>, you presented most of those, so I'd
>>>>>>> especially request your commentary there to be sure that nothing important
>>>>>>> was left out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *After this last task here, the OPRTF work will end, *and the EC
>>>>>>> will share this document with the NCUC community through the NCUC-Discuss
>>>>>>> list for public comment for 14 days. We thank those of you who dedicated
>>>>>>> your time and energy to help with this initiative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PS: Houda, as mentioned before (when deciding the date of this third
>>>>>>> meeting), our previous call was the last meeting of the OPRTF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cordially,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>>>>>>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>>>>>>> Researcher
>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>>>>>>> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
>>>>>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN)
>>>>>>> and CC Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If
>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Em dom., 6 de jul. de 2025 às 13:07, Houda CHIHI <
>>>>>>> houda.chihi at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear Namra,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thank you for your comments could you please update in the concern
>>>>>>>> of the next meeting date,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kind regards !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le ven. 4 juil. 2025 à 02:07, Namra Naseer <fr.namra at gmail.com> a
>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you everyone for attending and for those who were not able
>>>>>>>>> to attend, we will compile the work we have done so far and share. There
>>>>>>>>> were some components that demanded more discussion and you will learn about
>>>>>>>>> those as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Andrea for the support, always!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 1:44 PM Andrea Glandon <
>>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please find below the attendance and recordings from the
>>>>>>>>>> Operating Procedures Review Task Force meeting held on Thursday, 03 July
>>>>>>>>>> 2025 at 15:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This information is also available on the wiki here
>>>>>>>>>> <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AQDqE>.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Attendees: *Namra Naseer, Ken Herman, Gabriel Karsan, Mohammad
>>>>>>>>>> Atif Aleem, Pedro de Perdigão Lana| *Apologies: *Lily Botsyoe | *ICANN
>>>>>>>>>> org:* Andrea Glandon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Zoom Replay
>>>>>>>>>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/dalbDivPrbcO5zwDqLILFuvD0wsuO3VDNsMGvpq4qV22ZDzKB5FWX8KoM48Xnk-LUCKqByNOwfWwf29p.ytO_aVPbLwPPGOx7>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Audio Replay
>>>>>>>>>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/MC6qD_aMkN3B0W6wiKNll0nipU6-zywOfH9CefH_t5L2qaxzBHCqewcnz89ntikL16VriGjxKCOW9yE.78uiR9sX14Vl0VOV>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>>>>>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>>>>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>>>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>>
>>>> --
>> Oprtf mailing list
>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/oprtf/attachments/20250729/c1839b93/attachment-0001.htm>