[NCUC-EC] [NCUC OP Review] NCUC EC guidance and work timeline
Amin Hacha
aminhacha at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 15:38:23 CEST 2025
Hi Pedro,
Thank you for your email.
This is the final steps , or we have period to discuss/ask ?
Waiting your reply,
Regards,
Amin
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025, 16:35 Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear @Amin Hacha <aminhacha at gmail.com> , @Sara Ali
> <saraaliahm639 at gmail.com> , @Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com> ,
>
> We need at least one of you to vote so we can proceed - thanks!
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
> Em seg., 29 de set. de 2025 às 09:25, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With some delay (sorry, my fault!), here is the Google Docs for the NCUC
>> EC approval:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PRPv-MFLbRskBsvGkn7zoBEhQvZLk9pEZx9yvqzwhi4/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> It is the same link shared above. Most comments from the community and
>> from the EC (added until yesterday) were accepted and incorporated. We just
>> didn't accept those that were not sufficiently justified or were somewhat
>> cryptic. In this version, we left only the comments regarding recent
>> changes, and who were the people that suggested them.
>>
>> As agreed, we can now proceed with the 72h timeframe so you guys can
>> accept it. *Please, if everything is all right, answer this thread with
>> your "ok" *and eventual comments, within the 72h, so we can proceed to
>> the next step:
>>
>> 13. (...) the final version should be submitted to the members for public
>> comments
>> 14. Public comments on the final version shall be received for a minimum
>> of 15 days following its submission to the members via the NCUC-Discuss
>> list.
>> 15. EC shall publicly discuss the public comments within 15 days of the
>> close of the comment period and shall respond and resolve any outstanding
>> issues in the draft in its sole judgment. The EC shall approve the final
>> procedures by a majority of votes of EC members entitled to vote
>>
>> Meaning that we still have a public comment step and a last EC review of
>> the community suggestions before achieving the version that will be
>> officialized and published.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
>> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
>> mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>> Em qua., 17 de set. de 2025 às 11:31, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is the new Google Docs, as we agreed in our meeting yesterday. Just
>>> EC members (+Andrea) have access to it, with me and Namra as penholders and
>>> editors:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PRPv-MFLbRskBsvGkn7zoBEhQvZLk9pEZx9yvqzwhi4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> As agreed, considering we all already had a lot of time to read the doc
>>> before with its suggestions, EC members have 72 hours to leave their
>>> comments on the controversies, guiding. Namra and I will have another 72h
>>> to propose the new wording, considering the EC evaluation and proposals
>>> that are added to the doc as comments, and then we will send it back to the
>>> EC for approval within 72h.
>>>
>>> Cordially,
>>>
>>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>>> Researcher
>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>>> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
>>> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20251008/6d48acca/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the NCUC-EC
mailing list