[NCUC-EC] issue Forum Status?
Pedro de Perdigão Lana
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com
Wed May 29 15:59:04 CEST 2024
Hi everyone,
Considering how close we are to ICANN80, if the conversation with the RySG
does not start today, I think we may need your help, Julf.
Sorry Ken, I was really busy last week and couldn't help more. If you want
to schedule a call so we can define the details and proceed, I'm on holiday
tomorrow and the day after, so I'm pretty much free to talk according to
your availability - let's wait if Mili also answers today about her
availability, and define the date/hour tonight. Does this work for you?
Cordially,
*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.
Em qua., 29 de mai. de 2024 às 08:20, Johan Helsingius via NCUC-EC <
ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org> escreveu:
> Benjamin, Ken,
>
> Let me know if you need me to talk to the RrSG leadership.
>
> Julf
>
>
> On 29/05/2024 05:13, Ken Herman wrote:
> > Dear Benjamin, Thank you.
> >
> > As one of the participants, I remain available to provide additional
> > input, beyond the input I already provided. However, since the theme
> > seems to require participation by registrars, I ask, again, if you, in
> > your capacity as Chair of the NCUC, will be reaching out to the RrSG
> > requesting their participation. We can work out the details, but it
> > would be good to know whom we can call upon. If you have some other
> > approach, then please let us know.
> >
> > Mili and Pedro, perhaps we can speak in the next day or so to work on
> > those details.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > *From:*Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2024 5:12 PM
> > *To:* Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com>
> > *Cc:* Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: issue Forum Status?
> >
> > Dear Ken,
> >
> > Thank you for your email. The NCUC Issue Forum and NCUC membership
> > meeting require the input of NCUC official representatives to the ICANN
> > meeting.
> >
> > I have asked and requested topics and speakers; below is what I have so
> > far; the process is open to those of us attending ICANN80 to organize
> >
> > NCUC Issue forum
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gQA5Jv7zLkMSJx1-oDAxBXfuqx_cs9t4-7KrnArilPA/edit?usp=sharing
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gQA5Jv7zLkMSJx1-oDAxBXfuqx_cs9t4-7KrnArilPA/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> >
> > NCUC membership meeting
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qdHd3_NQJK5FR-spDQF3zOexHbeHHE0wJJtnlZYPZ-Q/edit
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qdHd3_NQJK5FR-spDQF3zOexHbeHHE0wJJtnlZYPZ-Q/edit
> >
> >
> > Additionally, contributions from you and Mili will go a long way in
> > finalizing the events.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Benjamin
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 6:21 PM Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com
> > <mailto:ken at kherman.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Benjamin, I’m wondering where we are with the issue forum planning.
> > Last I recall there were some ideas around registrant
> > rights/security, and the need to reach out to the Registrar SG, but
> > haven’t heard if anything has developed.
> >
> > Where do we stand, please?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20240529/446c533c/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCUC-EC
mailing list