[NCUC-EC] [Ext] Re: Possible collaboration - Internet fragmentation briefing series
Johan Helsingius
julf at Julf.com
Wed Jan 17 07:24:18 CET 2024
Unfortunately I have an appointment between 15:00 and 16:00 CET.
Depending on how punctually it ends I might be able to dial in
from the car on my way back.
Julf
On 17/01/2024 05:39, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> Dear Bruna and all,
> Thank you for your response. I will be available by 16:00 CET, I hope we
> can just find a short time to meet. I am flying before that time and
> unavailable.
>
> Thank you, Ajith, for your response. We will provide you with the
> necessary information as requested once we have the agenda set.
>
>
> Pedro, I hope you see this message in time; I can set up a Zoom link
> once everyone agrees to the meeting time for 16:00 CET.
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:17 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos
> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> @pedro, I trust its important to reach consensus about the session's
> concept before we start inviting or considering names of speakers.
>
> @Benjamin Akinmoyeje <mailto:benakin at gmail.com>, Im free tomorrow
> afternoon between 14h to 17h CET.
>
> Best,
> B
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 3:15 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje
> <benakin at gmail.com <mailto:benakin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Bruna,
> Good day, and thank you for your email. I agree with you that a
> call will be helpful.
> As we have indicated, we are open to collaboration, and
> advancing our HR discussions is critical.
>
> Let me know your preferred times for the Zoom calls.
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:49 PM Pedro de Perdigão Lana
> <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com
> <mailto:pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I’m available for that - would you like us to reach possible
> speakers and see their interest and knowledge in talking
> about this topic or for now should it be just us?
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>,
> Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial
> (UCoimbra),
> Membro da Coordenação - CC Brasil
> <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
> <https://isoc.org.br/> e IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
> Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se
> recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro.
>
>
> Em qui., 11 de jan. de 2024 às 06:58, Bruna Martins dos
> Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>> escreveu:
>
> Ben and all, would it be possible for us to jump on a
> quick call these upcoming days about the session?
>
> Just so we can discuss possible approaches and so on.
> Because I trust that a forum divided between the two
> topics would be somehow confusing, but one thing that
> can be done would be to have a speaker approaching the
> topic of Internet Fragmentation w/ a Human Rights lenses
> and further reinforcing that its a relevant discussion -
> especially from the perspective of avoiding the
> fragmentation of IG spaces - as we need all stakeholders
> at the same table and also being invited to promote some
> level of coordination between instances and topics.
>
> But happy to organise a quick call since it would be
> important to hear and get on a brainstorming session on
> this topic.
>
> kind regards,
> Bruna
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 7:03 AM Benjamin Akinmoyeje
> <benakin at gmail.com <mailto:benakin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Bruna,
> My day was busy, and there is some clarity at this
> point. The NCUC is ready and flexible to merge our
> topic with Global Partners Digital for a rich NCUC
> Issue Forum.
> There are multiple discussion channels in the
> planning of the NCUC Issue forum.
> We would like to have an active leading role in the
> session. We may have a couple of Zoom meetings to
> synergize appropriately.
>
> I am attaching the early draft of NCUC. Issue
> topic forum and added to the list are the leading
> collaborators Ephraim and Ajith (PIR).
>
> PIR has been a regular supporter of the NCUC issue
> forum.
>
> We should make good progress in this direction.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12OX-BG-XEdAM5yZYYgin28SXCy8hFNIlRp-TjZ5FrgE/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12OX-BG-XEdAM5yZYYgin28SXCy8hFNIlRp-TjZ5FrgE/edit>
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 3:12 AM Bruna Martins dos
> Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply, Ben.
>
> I understand NCUC has some level of independence
> for setting up the topics around the Issues
> Forum. At the opportunity I must also take some
> time to explain why Julf and I thought it would
> be a good idea:
>
> Internet Fragmentation, as you might know, has
> been a very active topic in the past couple of
> years. Especially since the UNSG decided to
> mention it as one of the main discussions to be
> developed under the GDC framework.
>
> Picking up on that, spaces like ICANN and the
> IGF decided to dive themselves and their
> communities further into the topic as a
> diagnose-making exercise. And this resulted in
> the plenary session ICANN hosted back in
> Malaysia, as well as a lot of debates within the
> IGF spaces too. And in most of such
> conversations the main conclusion was that
> talking about fragmentation could be something
> that reminds the broader IG community about the
> relevance of fostering coordination between not
> only stakeholders but also technical
> organisations such as ICANN, ISOC, the IETF and
> so on. All of this became even more relevant
> when - more recently - the Global Digital
> Compact failed to acknowledge the technical
> community as one stakeholder and with that
> ignoring a lot of the WSIS and Tunis Agenda
> advancements.
>
> Our main goal with such a proposal for NCUC was
> for your issues forum to discuss a topic that’s
> extremely pressing and has been highlighted as
> both ICANN Board and CEOs priorities in the past
> months.
>
> I’d say that I respect your decision but I
> happen to think this refusal is a bit sad as the
> conversation had potential and could even serve
> as a bridge to attract new members to our groups.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
>
> Global Campaigns Manager | Digital Action
> <http://digitalaction.co>
>
> German Chancellor Fellow 21'
> (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander von
> Humboldt Foundation
> <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
>
> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede
> <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus
> <https://igcaucus.org/>
>
> Twitter: @boomartins
> <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
> bruna.martinsantos
> Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
>
>
> Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com
> <mailto:benakin at gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo. 8.
> Jan. 2024 um 20:12:
>
> Dear Bruna,
> Good day to you, and Happy New Year.
> I had proposed 30 mins because we only had
> 75 mins and as it appears. The slot we got
> is also a shortfall from what your session
> requested,
>
> I believe the NCUC Issue forum can't be of
> use to the group as I had mentioned to Julf
> earlier.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:49 AM Bruna
> Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Heya, Julf and Ben,
>
> Good to hear that NCUC is willing to
> accommodate this discussion, but in
> order to move forward we would need to
> know how much time would NCUC be willing
> to allocate to us. And since its not a
> simple discussion, I'd say that 30 min
> or something around that won't really
> cut it as the session's goal was to
> present the issue and have a proper
> discussion w/ community.
>
> Also, it's a NCSG and Global partners
> Digital initiative, as part of a joint
> capacity building effort we would like
> to organize with our community. You know
> pretty well how meeting's requests go
> around ICANN and that its not really
> possible for "their team to get their
> session" since requests for meetings and
> rooms need to come from community groups.
>
> In the hopes of helping, I have crafted
> this session description to share with
> you. Apologies for not sharing it on
> friday, the deadline was a bit short
> without any previous warning. Here's the
> link:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10n0yAwRF4j9n4IuaVOuAkofFEsVyG-aiI8mWLnYt-bs/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10n0yAwRF4j9n4IuaVOuAkofFEsVyG-aiI8mWLnYt-bs/edit>
>
> Best,
> Bruna
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 8:21 PM Benjamin
> Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com
> <mailto:benakin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Julf,
> Thank you for your email.
>
> My response was just to share that
> NCUC was willing to accommodate the
> Global Partners within our routine
> Issue Forum, however, if that is
> not possible. It may be a good idea
> for the team to get their session.
>
> Kind regards,
> Benjamin
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 4:42 PM Johan
> Helsingius <julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Benjamin,
>
> As originally planned, the
> plenary session for ICANN79 was
> supposed to
> be 1h30. Not sure how much
> shorter it can be made.
>
> Julf
>
>
> On 05/01/2024 11:21, Benjamin
> Akinmoyeje wrote:
> > Dear Julf and Bruna,
> > Happy New Year, and I hope
> you enjoyed your holidays.
> >
> > We plan to discuss the
> session on Monday in our EC
> meeting, as stated by
> > Pedro.
> > However, we need some quick
> inputs.
> >
> > We have 75 minutes reserved
> for the NCUC Issue Forum; how
> long would the
> > Internet Fragmentation
> briefing take?
> >
> > Please provide the time and
> succinct description for us to
> see how we
> > can merge the session. Andrea
> requires that we finalize the
> description
> > for the session today.
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Benjamin
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at
> 7:29 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos
> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all, yes exactly!
> >
> > We will still organize
> one or two webinars prior to
> ICANN79 and then
> > had a plan for a plenary
> session that wasn’t much
> attractive in the
> > eyes of other chairs. Our
> proposal, therefore, would be to
> transform
> > the plenary into the
> issues forum !
> >
> > Best,
> > Bruna
> >
> > */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> > /*
> >
> > Global Campaigns Manager
> | Digital Action
> <http://digitalaction.co
> <http://digitalaction.co>>
> >
> > German Chancellor Fellow
> 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) |
> > Alexander von Humboldt
> Foundation
> <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/ <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>>
> >
> > Member | Coalizão
> Direitos na Rede
> <https://direitosnarede.org.br/
> <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>>
> > Co-Coordinator | Internet
> Governance Caucus
> <https://igcaucus.org/
> <https://igcaucus.org/>>
> >
> > Twitter: @boomartins
> <https://twitter.com/boomartins
> <https://twitter.com/boomartins>> // Skype:
> > bruna.martinsantos
> > Email:
> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>>
> >
> >
> > Johan Helsingius
> <julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>> schrieb am
> > Mi. 20. Dez. 2023 um 17:36:
> >
> > As far as I know (but
> Bruna can clarify and correct me
> if I am
> > wrong),
> > nothing has been
> nailed down yet, but the
> preliminary plan was
> > to do
> > part 1 as a webinar
> before ICANN79, and then 2 at
> ICANN79.
> >
> > Julf
> >
> > On 20/12/2023 11:24,
> Pedro de Perdigão Lana wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a question
> here: Is the proposal about the
> Plenary
> > Session
> > > (Output 2) being
> modified to our Issues Forum, or
> they are
> > doing Output
> > > 1 with us and,
> also during ICANN 79, another
> session on Internet
> > > Fragmentation?
> > >
> > > Cordially,
> > >
> > > *Pedro de Perdigão
> Lana*
> > > Lawyer
> <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/
> <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>
> >
> <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/ <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>>>, GEDAI/UFPR
> > >
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/>>>
> > Researcher
> > > PhD Candidate
> (UFPR), LLM in Business Law
> (UCoimbra)
> > > Board Member @ CC
> Brasil
> <https://br.creativecommons.net/
> <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> >
> <https://br.creativecommons.net/ <https://br.creativecommons.net/>>>, ISOC BR
> > >
> <https://isoc.org.br/
> <https://isoc.org.br/>
> <https://isoc.org.br/
> <https://isoc.org.br/>>> and IODA
> > <https://ioda.org.br/
> <https://ioda.org.br/>
> <https://ioda.org.br/
> <https://ioda.org.br/>>>
> > > This message is
> restricted to the sender and
> recipient(s). If
> > received
> > > by mistake, please
> reply informing it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Em qua., 20 de
> dez. de 2023 às 11:57, Johan
> Helsingius
> > <julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>
> > >
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>>> escreveu:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> Forwarded Message --------
> > > Subject:
> Re: [Ext] Re: Possible
> collaboration -
> > Internet
> > > fragmentation
> > > briefing series
> > > Date: Tue,
> 28 Nov 2023 23:22:38 +0000
> > > From:
> Michaela Nakayama Shapiro
> >
> <michaela at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org>
> <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org>>
> > >
> <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org>
> >
> <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org <mailto:michaela at gp-digital.org>>>>
> > > To: Bruna
> Martins dos Santos
> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
> >
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>>
> > >
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
> >
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>>>>
> > > CC:
> Daniela Schnidrig
> <daniela at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org>
> >
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org>>
> > >
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org>
> >
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:daniela at gp-digital.org>>>>, Sheetal Kumar
> > >
> <sheetal at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>>
> >
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>
> >
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>>>>, Keerti
> > > Rajagopalan
> <keerti at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org>
> >
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org>>
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org>
> >
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org
> <mailto:keerti at gp-digital.org>>>>,
> > > Johan
> Helsingius <julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>
> > <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>>>,
> Andrea Glandon
> > >
> <andrea.glandon at icann.org
> <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org>
> >
> <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org>>
> >
> <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org>
> >
> <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org <mailto:andrea.glandon at icann.org>>>>, Adam
> > > Peake
> <adam.peake at icann.org
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org>
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org>>
> >
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org>
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org
> <mailto:adam.peake at icann.org>>>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Bruna,
> > >
> > > As discussed
> on our recent call, we have put
> together a
> > more detailed
> > > version of the
> concept note for the briefing series
> > (accessible here
> > >
> >
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing>>>>
> > > and attached).
> The concept note now includes
> additional
> > context on
> > > internet
> fragmentation as it relates to
> ICANN's mandate
> > on the basis of
> > > recent trends
> and the 2022 plenary on the topic.
> > >
> > > Based on our
> discussion and in light of the
> upcoming
> > production
> > > planning
> > > call, we have
> included a timeline for
> finalising the
> > concept note in a
> > > table with
> roles and responsibilities
> across our teams
> > (see p.6). We
> > > wanted to ask
> whether it would be possible for
> you and
> > the ICANN
> > > team to
> > > _review and
> share any feedback with us by EOW (1
> > December)?_ This would
> > > be to ensure
> we have enough time to integrate any
> > feedback and
> > > circulate
> > > an updated
> draft to you by early next week
> to be
> > finalised by 6
> > > December.
> > >
> > > We also wanted
> to check whether there have been any
> > updates on the
> > > deadlines for
> suggesting plenaries for San Juan?
> > Additionally, should
> > > you have a
> sense of whether other parts of
> the community
> > would be
> > > willing to
> support a plenary like this that
> would be very
> > helpful to
> > > know for
> finalising the concept note.
> > >
> > > Please let us
> know if you have any questions.
> Looking
> > forward to
> > > hearing
> > > from you soon!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Michaela
> > >
> > > --
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Michaela
> Nakayama Shapiro*
> > > Officer,
> Advocacy & Engagement | GLOBAL
> PARTNERS DIGITAL
> > > T: +44 (0)7742
> 758019 | Time zone: GMT+1
> |gp-digital.org
> <http://gp-digital.org>
> >
> <http://gp-digital.org
> <http://gp-digital.org>>
> > >
> <http://gp-digital.org
> <http://gp-digital.org>
> <http://gp-digital.org
> <http://gp-digital.org>>>
> > >
> <http://gp-digital.org/
> <http://gp-digital.org/>
> <http://gp-digital.org/
> <http://gp-digital.org/>>
> >
> <http://gp-digital.org/
> <http://gp-digital.org/>
> <http://gp-digital.org/
> <http://gp-digital.org/>>>>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > GPD is proud
> to be an accredited four-day week
> > organisation that cares
> > > about the
> well-being of its team. Please
> note that our
> > office hours are
> > > now Monday to
> Thursday (9am-5pm UK time). Find
> out more here.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Nov
> 2023 at 11:35, Johan Helsingius
> > <julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>
> > >
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>>
> > >
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>
> > <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>
> <mailto:julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On
> 21/11/2023 11:55, Daniela
> Schnidrig wrote:
> > >
> > > > *
> We agreed that Bruna and Julf
> would review
> > deadlines for
> > > suggesting
> > > > a
> plenary session for San Juan and
> circle
> > back this week to
> > > >
> ascertain whether it's feasible.
> > >
> > > On that
> point, it might still be
> possible. The
> > plenary session
> > > contents
> > > will be
> discussed at the production
> planning call
> > on December
> > > 6. For
> > > that we
> should have a well-prepared
> proposal.
> > >
> > >
> Julf
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
>
> Global Campaigns Manager | Digital
> Action <http://digitalaction.co>
>
> German Chancellor Fellow 21'
> (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander
> von Humboldt Foundation
> <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
>
> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede
> <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance
> Caucus <https://igcaucus.org/>
>
> Twitter: @boomartins
> <https://twitter.com/boomartins> //
> Skype: bruna.martinsantos
> Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> --
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
>
> Global Campaigns Manager | Digital Action
> <http://digitalaction.co>
>
> German Chancellor Fellow 21'
> (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander von Humboldt
> Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
>
> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede
> <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus
> <https://igcaucus.org/>
>
> Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> //
> Skype: bruna.martinsantos
> Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> --
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
>
> Global Campaigns Manager | Digital Action <http://digitalaction.co>
>
> German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) |
> Alexander von Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
>
> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus <https://igcaucus.org/>
>
> Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
> bruna.martinsantos
> Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <mailto:bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
>
More information about the NCUC-EC
mailing list