[NCUC-EC] [Ext] Re: Possible collaboration - Internet fragmentation briefing series

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi,

I have a question here: Is the proposal about the Plenary Session (Output
2) being modified to our Issues Forum, or they are doing Output 1 with us
and, also during ICANN 79, another session on Internet Fragmentation?

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
<https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em qua., 20 de dez. de 2023 às 11:57, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
escreveu:

>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:        Re: [Ext] Re: Possible collaboration - Internet
> fragmentation
> briefing series
> Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 23:22:38 +0000
> From:   Michaela Nakayama Shapiro <michaela at gp-digital.org>
> To:     Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
> CC:     Daniela Schnidrig <daniela at gp-digital.org>, Sheetal Kumar
> <sheetal at gp-digital.org>, Keerti Rajagopalan <keerti at gp-digital.org>,
> Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>, Andrea Glandon
> <andrea.glandon at icann.org>, Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Hi Bruna,
>
> As discussed on our recent call, we have put together a more detailed
> version of the concept note for the briefing series (accessible here
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18M7cjAiGBhOHOEDR_KZzFE5Gr1XA4meRUBUxGo3oaug/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> and attached). The concept note now includes additional context on
> internet fragmentation as it relates to ICANN's mandate on the basis of
> recent trends and the 2022 plenary on the topic.
>
> Based on our discussion and in light of the upcoming production planning
> call, we have included a timeline for finalising the concept note in a
> table with roles and responsibilities across our teams (see p.6). We
> wanted to ask whether it would be possible for you and the ICANN team to
> _review and share any feedback with us by EOW (1 December)?_ This would
> be to ensure we have enough time to integrate any feedback and circulate
> an updated draft to you by early next week to be finalised by 6 December.
>
> We also wanted to check whether there have been any updates on the
> deadlines for suggesting plenaries for San Juan? Additionally, should
> you have a sense of whether other parts of the community would be
> willing to support a plenary like this that would be very helpful to
> know for finalising the concept note.
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions. Looking forward to hearing
> from you soon!
>
> Best,
>
> Michaela
>
> --
> *
> *
> *Michaela Nakayama Shapiro*
> Officer, Advocacy & Engagement | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
> T: +44 (0)7742 758019 | Time zone: GMT+1 |gp-digital.org
> <http://gp-digital.org/>
>
> ---
>
>
>
>
> GPD is proud to be an accredited four-day week organisation that cares
> about the well-being of its team. Please note that our office hours are
> now Monday to Thursday (9am-5pm UK time). Find out more here.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 11:35, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:
>
>      On 21/11/2023 11:55, Daniela Schnidrig wrote:
>
>       >   * We agreed that Bruna and Julf would review deadlines for
>      suggesting
>       >     a plenary session for San Juan and circle back this week to
>       >     ascertain whether it's feasible.
>
>      On that point, it might still be possible. The plenary session
> contents
>      will be discussed at the production planning call on December 6. For
>      that we should have a well-prepared proposal.
>
>               Julf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20231220/438e9e25/attachment.htm>