[NCUC-EC] Fwd: [NCUC] Call for inputs - 1:1 - NCUC Chair & ICANN CEO

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi everyone,

Farzi sent me the message below. I think we could sum this up as "Bylaws
concerns CPH approval of the amended contractual agreement". @Benjamin
Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com> , would you be comfortable to talk about
this, so Andrea can add to the agenda?

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>,  Pesquisador (
GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
Membro da Coordenação - CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/> e IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
engano, favor responder informando o erro.


---------- Forwarded message ---------
De: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
Date: qui., 14 de dez. de 2023 às 14:47
Subject: Re: [NCUC] Call for inputs - 1:1 - NCUC Chair & ICANN CEO
To: Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>
Cc: David Morar <davidcristianmorar at gmail.com>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, Raymond Mamattah <mamattah.raymond at gmail.com>


Pedro,

I just found out that the I thi. Tomslin mentioned this before but I think
we need to raise some concern about their lack of response to our comments.
This whole process felt like PIR and big players got together, set up the
agenda, did some hand waving at the stakeholders and did whatever they
wanted. They tell us we should be happy that they put in content governance
should not be in the remit but why would that make us happy? content
governance is not in the mission of ICANN according to its bylaws, any
contractual amendment that is against the bylaws cannot pass!

Just posted this on LinkedIn:

ICANN Contracted Parties House (CPH) has approved the bilateral amendments
about DNS Abuse.
https://lnkd.in/enJ34aFs

They are celebrating but let me tell you why I am not celebrating (and this
is not a revolutionary event, a bunch of powerful actors felt pressure, got
together and said we should do these changes-which will have minimal effect
on DNS abuse situation because there is no situation to be solved, DNS is
working!!!)
1. Complete disregard of the multistakeholder process. There was a public
comment process which we as the noncommercials weighed in and there was
silence. They set the agenda somewhere else and came to approve it at
ICANN. As simple as that. (one example is we objected to the addition of
Spam as a form of delivery of malware, which was a simple removal!)

2. A few registries and registrars got together and imposed their business
model on the rest.

3. In the end all of these issues are because of ICANN's lack of desire to
preserve competition among the registries and registrars.

I actually believe industry consortiums can do incredible work in this
space, so why don't we just wrap up this multistakeholder vanity fair and
go home!
Farzaneh


On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:35 PM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Farzaneh, David, Bruna, Raymond,
>
> Do you have any topics you would like to bring up in the NCUC conversation
> with Sally?
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> De: Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>
> Date: qui., 14 de dez. de 2023 às 08:58
> Subject: Fwd: [NCUC] Call for inputs - 1:1 - NCUC Chair & ICANN CEO
> To: Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>
>
> Hi
>
> We got no suggestions - I asked the NCSG chair f if he received any topics
> that wouldn't fit in his time, but no luck on that side too. I really do
> not have a substantial point to help in Sally's 1:1, maybe we should ask
> directly to some of our more active members?
>
> Just remembering, Andrea mentioned that our deadline is today.
>
> Cordially,
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> De: Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>
> Date: ter., 12 de dez. de 2023 às 13:15
> Subject: [NCUC] Call for inputs - 1:1 - NCUC Chair & ICANN CEO
> To: NCUC Discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The NCUC chair will have a 1:1 with Sally Costerton, interim CEO of ICANN.
> The Executive Committee would like to know if our members have any
> suggestions for topics and questions that we should discuss in the meeting.
>
> The deadline to send your inputs is Wednesday (Dec. 13th), midnight, UTC.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.sistemafiep.org.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR
> <https://www.gedai.com.br/> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20231214/5d43f1f3/attachment-0001.htm>