[NCUC-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] REMINDER: Feedback on proposal to form Community Coordination Group to work on select WS2 recommendations implementation

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Thanks Ken. I'll report to Mary and everyone accordingly, i.e. that we are
not in favor of such a "group" to the extent that the mandate (and even
form, honestly - it sounds like it may be a mailing list, or something much
bigger...) is not clarified.

Have a nice day,

On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com> wrote:

> Raphael, given that I probably don’t fully understand the issue, I agree
> with your assessment, except that I would actively oppose this. Although
> such a proposed mechanism might facilitate communication in some way,
> probably there are already established channels for communication and
> coordination. Groups of any kind require terms of reference and oversight
> and come with opportunities for conflict. In any event, it is not clear to
> me why ICANN org is not already doing what is suggested for this group.
> Therefore, I would oppose creating any new mechanisms unless there is a
> more clearly defined problem and alternative solutions are presented.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> *On Behalf Of *Raphael
> Beauregard-Lacroix
> *Sent:* Friday, October 1, 2021 7:38 PM
> *To:* Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject:* [NCUC-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] REMINDER: Feedback on
> proposal to form Community Coordination Group to work on select WS2
> recommendations implementation
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
> Your views on this, please
>
>
>
> Personally I would not oppose it but I don't really think that such a
> mailing list would either be used or useful. Reaching out for coordination
> is already possible for those who want to do it; if it doesn't happen it is
> not by lack of proper vehicle, but for a plethora of other reasons...
>
>
>
> Anyhow, as I said, let me know. Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Mary Wong* <mary.wong at icann.org>
> Date: Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:30 PM
> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] REMINDER: Feedback on proposal to form
> Community Coordination Group to work on select WS2 recommendations
> implementation
> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org <gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Dear GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency leaders,
>
>
>
> I’m writing to ask if you can let Philippe know (if you haven’t already)
> whether your group supports the proposal to form a Community Coordination
> Group, to serve as the central contact point for collaboration,
> prioritization and information sharing on those few Work Stream 2 (WS2)
> recommendations directed at the community and that require cross-SOAC
> coordination. Specifically, those recommendations are Recommendations 1.1
> and 1.7 (related to diversity), Recommendation 2.3 (on possibly
> establishing a uniform framework for certain Empowered Community actions),
> and – for information sharing purposes – Recommendation 3 (on each SO and
> AC incorporating the Framework for Interpretation on Human Rights into its
> respective policy development and advice activities).
>
>
>
> As you may recall, ICANN org first raised the idea of forming such a group
> during a SOAC Chairs Roundtable in late May, for each community to
> consider. This coming Monday, 4 October, the topic will be on the agenda
> for another SOAC Chairs Roundtable, where we hope to have confirmation one
> way or the other from all the community groups as to the utility of and
> support for this proposal.
>
>
>
> If it helps, the group is not envisioned to be a decision-making body as
> such, since decisions will need to be taken by the individual community
> groups affected by a particular WS2 recommendation. We expect that the role
> of the Community Coordination Group will primarily be to share views across
> the community and act as the main contact point and communication vehicle
> for all the participating groups. Obviously, we also expect that all
> discussions taking place within the Community Coordination Group will be
> recorded and made publicly available.
>
>
>
> I hope this note is useful and that you will be able to convey your
> group’s view of the proposal to Philippe by Monday; especially if your
> group does NOT support the idea. Philippe is on this mailing list so feel
> free to reply to this note to everyone. Thank you!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mary
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list
> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sg-c-leadership
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20211003/2357927d/attachment-0001.htm>