[NCUC-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] REMINDER: Feedback on proposal to form Community Coordination Group to work on select WS2 recommendations implementation

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Dear all

Your views on this, please

Personally I would not oppose it but I don't really think that such a
mailing list would either be used or useful. Reaching out for coordination
is already possible for those who want to do it; if it doesn't happen it is
not by lack of proper vehicle, but for a plethora of other reasons...

Anyhow, as I said, let me know. Thanks!



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Date: Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:30 PM
Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] REMINDER: Feedback on proposal to form
Community Coordination Group to work on select WS2 recommendations
implementation
To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org <gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org>


Dear GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency leaders,



I’m writing to ask if you can let Philippe know (if you haven’t already)
whether your group supports the proposal to form a Community Coordination
Group, to serve as the central contact point for collaboration,
prioritization and information sharing on those few Work Stream 2 (WS2)
recommendations directed at the community and that require cross-SOAC
coordination. Specifically, those recommendations are Recommendations 1.1
and 1.7 (related to diversity), Recommendation 2.3 (on possibly
establishing a uniform framework for certain Empowered Community actions),
and – for information sharing purposes – Recommendation 3 (on each SO and
AC incorporating the Framework for Interpretation on Human Rights into its
respective policy development and advice activities).



As you may recall, ICANN org first raised the idea of forming such a group
during a SOAC Chairs Roundtable in late May, for each community to
consider. This coming Monday, 4 October, the topic will be on the agenda
for another SOAC Chairs Roundtable, where we hope to have confirmation one
way or the other from all the community groups as to the utility of and
support for this proposal.



If it helps, the group is not envisioned to be a decision-making body as
such, since decisions will need to be taken by the individual community
groups affected by a particular WS2 recommendation. We expect that the role
of the Community Coordination Group will primarily be to share views across
the community and act as the main contact point and communication vehicle
for all the participating groups. Obviously, we also expect that all
discussions taking place within the Community Coordination Group will be
recorded and made publicly available.



I hope this note is useful and that you will be able to convey your group’s
view of the proposal to Philippe by Monday; especially if your group does
NOT support the idea. Philippe is on this mailing list so feel free to
reply to this note to everyone. Thank you!



Best regards,

Mary
_______________________________________________
GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list
GNSO-SG-C-Leadership at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-sg-c-leadership

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20211001/528812fe/attachment.htm>