[NCUC-EC] FY22 ABR - Due in 48 hours

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Thanks all for your contributions, I've just sent with our list in CC.

Have a nice weekend,

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:12 PM Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com> wrote:

> I’ve also made a few edits and also appreciate your beginning the process.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> *On Behalf Of *Olga
> Kyryliuk
> *Sent:* Friday, January 29, 2021 6:15 AM
> *To:* Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-EC] FY22 ABR - Due in 48 hours
>
>
>
> Dear Raphael,
>
>
>
> I have looked through the ABR draft google doc and left a few comments and
> suggestions. Apologize for making it last minute.
>
>
>
> To be honest I spent quite some time looking through ICANN reports on
> approved and denied ABRs trying to figure out what other requests we could
> make. At least my personal conclusion is that many requests are repeated
> from year to year. It is even more complicated given the remote mode of our
> interactions during the last year. Hopefully, if this ABR gets accepted
> we'll manage to improve our online presence, which is indeed very important.
>
>
>
> Apart from ABR, my big concern is how to make membership more involved and
> pro-active. It is smth that none ABR would help us to solve but it is also
> a huge challenge. So let's think maybe we could indeed use our ICANN 70
> slot in some more innovative, interesting and efficient way.
>
>
>
> Have a great day and thanks for putting this ABR together!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Olga
>
>
>
>
>
> *28 января 2021, 17:52:01, от "Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix" <**rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com
> <rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com>**>:*
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Another follow up:
>
>
>
> It appears that like NCSG (and NPOC), we dispose of a 10 000 USD/year
> allowance for technical expenses.
>
>
>
> For those of you unfamiliar with how this kind of "money" works, I'll be
> happy to provide a more detailed explanation during our next call.
>
>
>
> In any case, the realization of that prompted me to rephrase our ABR, in
> order to make Org understand that our request is one for guidance in how to
> best make use of that money, rather than having it spent on figuring things
> out with a commercial web developer, for example.
>
>
>
> So even if you had a look previously, I would kindly ask you to have a
> look at the request form again in order to make sure that this idea is
> clearly conveyed.
>
>
>
> A simple request for money for technical expenses, or expenses related to
> promotional materials, will simply be denied on the basis that we already
> dispose of money for such things.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your collaboration and have a nice day,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:02 PM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <
> rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A quick follow up I forgot: RySG asked for something equivalent last year
> and it got denied, on the basis that Org is "reconsidering" its approach to
> IT support to community groups. We may get a similar answer this year.
> Let's see...
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=134513539
>
>
>
> Have a nice day,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:57 PM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <
> rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your contribution. The draft is now complete as it stands,
> and I would kindly ask for your final review.
>
>
>
> I will be sending it tomorrow COB eurotime.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 9:44 PM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <
> rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Submission is due soon; Ben and I have thrown some ideas on the doc
> although it is far from being complete/properly written out (apologies in
> advance for that)
>
>
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BlJWfCUl4z5e3VZxNGLqexdq0SfhvrzIfPeodrHgVcQ/edit#
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BlJWfCUl4z5e3VZxNGLqexdq0SfhvrzIfPeodrHgVcQ/edit>
>
>
>
> I'd be glad if you could jump in, if only to do some clean up/flesh ideas
> out more properly.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your collaboration!
>
>
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> NCUC-EC mailing list
>
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20210129/a4c34214/attachment.htm>