[NCUC-EC] Draft FY21 ABR doc for Org - REVIEW BY 17 DEC

[Ken Herman]

Hi Raphael.

 

I’ve made a few editing suggestions but otherwise looks good to me. 

 

My only general comment is that it’s a lot of material to include, and absorb, in a 90 - 120 minute session, especially on a virtual presentation, when attention-spans can dwindle. I do not have a lot of experience with these trainings so I admit it’s hard for me to judge, and I defer to others with more experience. Someone can maybe help me understand how prescriptive we need to be with Org, do we tell them everything or do we simply let them know what we want to do and let the education specialists there design the best approach?

 

If left to us, my only suggestion is to consider breaking the training into two sessions, which would have the benefit of allowing time for the class cohort to both digest the material as well as interact between the sessions. An exercise can be added to the first session which could reinforce the material.

 

I realize there may be challenges to get participants into even one class, much less two, but I would wonder that if participants are not engaged enough to finish the training then how motivated would they be to participate at all.

 

Ken

 

 

 

From: NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> On Behalf Of Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 12:31 PM
To: Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
Subject: [NCUC-EC] Draft FY21 ABR doc for Org - REVIEW BY 17 DEC

 

Dear all,

 

As promised, please find below. 

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m_hdfKoebb-4qmRy6zopbIpBpdemSw7sSp1audhK354/edit?usp=sharing

 

I would kindly ask you to review this document ASAP and by no later than Thursday 17 Dec 23:59 UTC, so that it can be circulated with NCSG and NPOC leadership for coordination.

 

thank you, and have a nice day,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20201217/85528186/attachment.html>