[NCUC-EC] [time sentitive] NCUC ABRs

Tue Jan 15 01:14:14 CET 2019

Sure, Lou. Feel free to share with NCUC-Discuss.

best,
B.

Em seg, 14 de jan de 2019 às 22:08, Louise Marie Hurel <
louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> Thought it might be good for us to share the document at our Discuss list
> prior to submitting, just in case anyone wants to add some final comments.
> How does that sound?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Louise Marie Hurel
>
> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>
> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications (Data and
> Society)
> Skype: louise.dias
> +44 (0) 7468 906327
> *l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk <l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk> *
> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 22:51, Louise Marie Hurel <
> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've started to jot down some ideas for our ABRs. Up to this point, I've
>> managed to assemble a short list of what we might consider and develop as
>> proposals -- taking into account FY18 and FY19 successful requests. It
>> includes the continuation of the Policy Writing Course (2nd round),
>> Communication materials, Logistics support (for outreach -- food for joint
>> ALAC-NCUC outreach for example), and other points.
>>
>> With regards to the "resubmission" of requests, I think our main
>> challenge is how to address the metrics adequately and justify the (i)
>> impact and (ii) outcome of the initiatives in FY19. This would also be a
>> good opportunity for us to engage members in different regions to help us
>> translate and circulate -- key for any kind of CS outreach/inreach we might
>> consider in the near future.
>>
>> In terms of communication support, we might consider issuing some new
>> privacy stickers, flyers, and even doing a short version of the onboarding
>> materials -- share it in our networks and communicate with wider CS on what
>> are our principles and how we engage within the ICANN ecosystem.
>>
>> Finally, I strongly support the inclusion for additional funding for
>> global IG events. The only thing we need to take care is how to properly
>> justify this, and that might entail (i) explaining how we have engaged
>> globally thus far, (ii) what is the demand (in this case one of the
>> arguments is that CROP does not cover the "global" strategic events, such
>> as the IGF or major conferences such as RightsCon, CPDP, Internet and
>> Jurisdiction etc..); and (iii) how we are using the resources we have to
>> meet this opportunity and why the ABR would be THE option for us to take
>> NCUC experience in policymaking and global civil society engagement
>> further.
>>
>> Again, this is just a simple/preliminary list that we could develop.
>> Please feel free to chime in, add some ideas, and start working on it.
>> I'll stop to work a bit more on this tomorrow. :)
>>
>> Here's the doc:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tmwkBG4hY_fMmMN7gmaMwplWOy_AWa0pd9RLbthYZ9E/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Louise Marie Hurel
>>
>> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>>
>> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications (Data and
>> Society)
>> Skype: louise.dias
>> +44 (0) 7468 906327
>> *l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk <l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk> *
>> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 20:22, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I have been thinking about submitting an ABR around participation
>>> at global events, such as the IGF.  With CROPs being regional now and
>>> mostly attained to ICANN meetings, we lost some good opportunities of
>>> participation in important events.
>>>
>>> So maybe we could submit something on the grounds of organising a
>>> side-event, that could or could not be cross-community, to discuss Civil
>>> Society Participation in Internet Governance. - but I would need your guys
>>> help to better develop the idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Em sáb, 12 de jan de 2019 às 17:12, Michael Karanicolas <
>>> mkaranicolas at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The only idea that jumps to mind for me is the previous ABR that we
>>>> used to go to INTA. It was actually more successful than I could have
>>>> predicted, including making good inroads to academic folks who work on
>>>> IP issues related to our work.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a copy of the previous ABR, though I have the posting
>>>> that Farzi sent around below. Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com via listserv.syr.edu
>>>>
>>>> Fri, Jan 12, 2018, 3:03 PM
>>>> to NCSG-DISCUSS
>>>> Dear NCSG members,
>>>>
>>>> Two travel support slots are available for NCSG members to attend INTA
>>>>  annual meeting :https://www.inta.org/2018Annual/Pages/Home.aspx
>>>>
>>>> The meeting is targeted at IP rights of brand owners and the
>>>> applicants need extensive knowledge of IP and how INTA and similar
>>>> association work. If you are interested, please apply by sending an
>>>> email to me and Maryam and express your interest. Please note the
>>>> travel support was approved by ICANN through an additional budget
>>>> request, ICANN has set a condition that 1. you should be located in
>>>> North America to go to INTA and 2. need to write a report after the
>>>> event.
>>>>
>>>> You need to also have a good knowledge of IP law, and be familiar with
>>>> how NCSG tries to combat trademark overreach at ICANN. You are also
>>>> required to have a clear plan on what you are going to do at INTA, if
>>>> you are planning to meet with certain IP law firms that are aligned in
>>>> mission with NCSG and how you are going to use this opportunity to
>>>> forge stronger allies with like minded IP lawyers.
>>>>
>>>> Apply by 31 January 2018 13.00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:05 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Dear EC,
>>>> >
>>>> > Do you guys have any thoughts on this ? Are we resubmitting any of
>>>> the approved ABRs, is there any new idea we should aim for ?
>>>> >
>>>> > I would really appreciate to get any thoughts on this.
>>>> >
>>>> > best,
>>>> > Bruna
>>>> >
>>>> > Em ter, 8 de jan de 2019 às 12:50, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
>>>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dear EC,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Our deadline for submitting ABRs is approaching - jan 15th. We have
>>>> an EC call next week to discuss the final versions and what are we
>>>> submitting, but we havent yet started drafting any.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Therefore I would like to request your help to start writing the
>>>> proposals, for  ease of reference, all the FY19 Approved ABRs are uploaded
>>>> here:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> https://community.icann.org/x/zodHBQ
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I will have a meeting with Thato in 10 min to hear a little more
>>>> from the FC on this subject and will update you guys soon.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Best,
>>>> >> Bruna
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> >> @boomartins
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >
>>>> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> > @boomartins
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>>>
>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>> @boomartins
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20190114/59bb2d8f/attachment.html>