[NCUC-EC] announcing ICANN63 travel slot?

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Calls can not be made with less than 14 business days - Operating Procedures
Also already asked and answered

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Shahul had majority for the first NCUC Fellowship Slot
> 2. Dina had only one vote on the second NCUC slot,
> 3. We had only two ECs thinking out loud, not really voting and oscilliating
> between Ben and Dina for the second NCUC Slot
> 4. We do not have any abstain from any EC on the record.
> 5. We did not have an ICANN63 CROP Call separate from NCUC Fellowship so, no
> call, no applicants, no slot to allocate and more importantly not a single
> EC vote on CROP ICANN63.So no CROP ALLOCATION FROM NCUC FOR ICANN63
> 6. In addition to a procedural issue that myself and Bruna raised concerning
> the abscence of a call for CROP as other constituencies did, I was happy to
> learn from Mariam and Tapani that NPOC also has its 3 ICANN or ICANN related
> events CROP.
> 7.Deadline to send a name is August 31st we are August 29th.
> 8. The announcement made on ncuc and ncsg members mailing list wont change
> anything to the facts listed above.
> 9. The public announcement on the travel smot allocations is erronous and
> does not reflect EV decisions.
>
>
> Le mercredi 29 août 2018, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>> Hey all,
>> The reason why the EC is a collegiate group is so that we make decisions
>> collectively and provided the input from our peers. Whenever we approach
>> debates assuming external factors such as "backchannel lobbying" we are not
>> only demeaning the group but also our peers capability of making a decision
>> on their own, and this should never be the case.
>>
>> Since the beginning we have approached debates and tallys in a very
>> respectful manner and also observing our bylaws. If in some cases our EC
>> members did not get the chance to respond to an vote or weigh in a subject,
>> consensus calls for the majority's will - if we had followed that MO Dina
>> should have had the funding instead of the CROP given that Michael had voted
>> for her. What bothers me about this specific situation, other than the
>> personal attacks - a question suffered by some or all of us previously and
>> that we tried to address as a collegiate -, is that we gave a CROP without a
>> call or even a mention of an allocation possibility that was initially
>> directed to NCUC without going evaluating any CROP outreach plans from the
>> selected member. Had we announced that and I am pretty sure of other members
>> that could have possibly applied for this specific slot - as I highlighted
>> in previous emails.
>>
>> As to the CROP slot deadline, there was never a clear understanding on
>> whether or not filling slot today or lets say in november would imply on
>> NCUC losing it. What would be lost if there wasnt any announcements today
>> was the opportunity of using this crop slot for the barcelona meeting, and
>> not the slot per se.
>> I really wish we had more conversations about this specific issue instead
>> of arriving at this situation we find ourselves at rn.
>> Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 13:40, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>>
>>> Hi Renata,
>>> I have all the right to abstain when I sense that I would be making a
>>> decision without a proper base. I did not abstain this time though, I rather
>>> waited, keepig an eye out for any deliberations that could affect how to
>>> weigh in NPOC Chair’s recommendation for instance. I understand there was a
>>> deadline, but I will never make a decision when I’m not entirely sure based
>>> on what I would be making it. And I have the right as well as the
>>> responsibility to do so.
>>> As for conflict of interest, I still haven’t taken up the role of GNSO
>>> Councilor, as mentioned several times, I am still acting as NCUC EC AP until
>>> Barcelona. This was made clear in so many different exchanges both formally
>>> and informally. Just FYI, I haven’t even been added to the GNSO Council
>>> mailing list as a councelor nor have I had handover, the only exchange that
>>> was made relating to this position was mitigating my presence in Barcelona
>>> for the start of my Councilor role. To have to justify this to you, is quite
>>> surprising to me.
>>> In any case, this thread is aimed to speak about a specific issue, and
>>> tackling the fact that on the list, it will seem like the EC actually made a
>>> final clear cut decision about the allocations, when we actually did not
>>> entirely do that. Let us refrain from opening side discussions that I would
>>> tackle on a different thread.
>>> Best,
>>> Elsa
>>> —
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:28 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Elsa,
>>>>
>>>> You abstained on your 2nd vote and the deadline passed.
>>>> In fact, you always abstain on difficult decisions.
>>>>
>>>> Right now, you are also omitting the conflict of interest of being EC
>>>> AP and GNSO Councillor, which I have asked you time and time again
>>>> privately to address on the main NCUC list.
>>>>
>>>> Please do it so
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Im honestly out of words as to the way this has unfolded. To start
>>>> > with the
>>>> > exchange between Farzi and Renata where it was implied that we were
>>>> > being
>>>> > manipulated into making a decision, to eventually making a choice for
>>>> > the EC
>>>> > due to the deadline. I do understand that there was a deadline and
>>>> > staff
>>>> > would be out for a longer time than we can afford, however, I
>>>> > personally saw
>>>> > a lot of potential in other candidates that I would have voted for, if
>>>> > there
>>>> > wasn’t so much confusion on how to weigh in, with the different
>>>> > lobbying
>>>> > from all sides. I’m not sure as to what kind of standard we will be
>>>> > handing
>>>> > over to the next EC. And it would be risky to just handover the way we
>>>> > dealt
>>>> > with these allocations as is.
>>>> >
>>>> > Since the news is out, there isn’t much that can be done. But for the
>>>> > record, I believe there should be more trust in the EC’s capability of
>>>> > making a decision on their own without fear of interferance or
>>>> > ‘manipulation’, and there should be more of a comprehensive strategy
>>>> > when it
>>>> > comes to choosing candidates. Where are the newcomers in this batch of
>>>> > chosen candidates for instance? What’s the outcome of having them at
>>>> > ICANN63
>>>> > for us all? Is it serving the aim of policy development or not? Of
>>>> > outreach?
>>>> > Of welcoming new faces? Of proper funding allocation?
>>>> >
>>>> > My two cents here.
>>>> >
>>>> > E.
>>>> > —
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:49 AM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>>> > <raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dear EC
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I am sorry but you missed the deadline for announcement for 2 days
>>>> >> already.
>>>> >> And yes, I did mention that we would very likely lose CROP ICANN63
>>>> >> date if we don't use, as the recent reminder of Ozan implies.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We are already losing 9000USD on website management funding because
>>>> >> the EC did not come up with any contribution on this.
>>>> >> We discovered we had this funding in August and it is very likely the
>>>> >> new Chair may not be able to tap into it.
>>>> >> I haven't been able to address small suggestions to it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So we need to be more fiscally responsible to NCUC as well as
>>>> >> respecting our Operating Procedures.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> There is no time for  a call for ICANN63, we were questioned 2 days
>>>> >> ago, our staff is out until 10Sept.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I understand the pressure on you but squandering funding is the worst
>>>> >> you can do.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Best,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Renata
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Michael Karanicolas
>>>> >> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > I also don't understand this course of action. As I understand it,
>>>> >> > we
>>>> >> > were
>>>> >> > deliberating the travel slots - and all that remained was to decide
>>>> >> > between
>>>> >> > Ben or Dina. Nobody has suggested allocating the CROP and, as Bruna
>>>> >> > says, we
>>>> >> > haven't done a proper call.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I would suggest the Chair hold back on this, and we ask the EC
>>>> >> > folks who
>>>> >> > voted for Ben OR Dina to just pick one or the other, with a
>>>> >> > deadline of
>>>> >> > COB
>>>> >> > today.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:29 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>>> >> > <raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Dear Bruna
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Unfortunately I have time and time again given the EC the
>>>> >> >> opportunity
>>>> >> >> to participate on the CROP Outreach Plan, on the deadline to
>>>> >> >> ICANN63
>>>> >> >> and on the weighing in on solutions.
>>>> >> >> I'm sorry you oppose now but we are out of options
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Best,
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Renata
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > We did not open a call for this one and it will raise questions
>>>> >> >> > in
>>>> >> >> > our
>>>> >> >> > membership as to why we gave it to Dina once this was never
>>>> >> >> > announced
>>>> >> >> > to
>>>> >> >> > the
>>>> >> >> > larger list. And also, I dont believe that there is such thing
>>>> >> >> > as an
>>>> >> >> > interpretation that if we dont use this crop NOW we are to lose,
>>>> >> >> > given
>>>> >> >> > that
>>>> >> >> > the three slots shall be used until the end of FY19.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 12:18, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Dear Renata,
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> I am sorry but I oppose this idea. We were not discussing CROP,
>>>> >> >> >> we
>>>> >> >> >> were
>>>> >> >> >> discussing travel support.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 12:17, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>>> >> >> >> <raquino at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> Dear all
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> We should have announced this on the 27aug
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> We also have the CROP ICANN63 slot to an EU NCUC member
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> We just received a reminder today to use it, at the risk of
>>>> >> >> >>> losing
>>>> >> >> >>> it
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> I have read all the emails and I'll do the following
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> Travel Support - 1st slot
>>>> >> >> >>> Shahul Hameed
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> Travel Support - 2nd slot
>>>> >> >> >>> Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> CROP ICANN63
>>>> >> >> >>> I'll work with Dina Thomas on a NCUC CROP outreach plan and
>>>> >> >> >>> send it
>>>> >> >> >>> to
>>>> >> >> >>> the EC and to the CROP staff.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> Best,
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> Renata
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> >>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>> > Dear All,
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > I believe that according the advice provided by Farzi we
>>>> >> >> >>> > still
>>>> >> >> >>> > have
>>>> >> >> >>> > this
>>>> >> >> >>> > year to decide whether or not we are using this support
>>>> >> >> >>> > exclusively
>>>> >> >> >>> > to
>>>> >> >> >>> > NCUC
>>>> >> >> >>> > members or if we are opening the selection to NPOC and NCSG
>>>> >> >> >>> > as
>>>> >> >> >>> > well
>>>> >> >> >>> > -
>>>> >> >> >>> > as we
>>>> >> >> >>> > did in this one - but as this selection is still subjected
>>>> >> >> >>> > to
>>>> >> >> >>> > NCUC
>>>> >> >> >>> > EC I
>>>> >> >> >>> > believe that we should continue to perform by selecting the
>>>> >> >> >>> > funded
>>>> >> >> >>> > members
>>>> >> >> >>> > based on the quality of their outreach plans and application
>>>> >> >> >>> > independently
>>>> >> >> >>> > of the approach we seek to follow - opening calls or using
>>>> >> >> >>> > them
>>>> >> >> >>> > for
>>>> >> >> >>> > NCUC
>>>> >> >> >>> > only.
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > In that sense, I am also between Dina and Ben.
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > Dina provided a good application and is also supported by
>>>> >> >> >>> > NPOC
>>>> >> >> >>> > Leadership,
>>>> >> >> >>> > but I agree with Louise on the "her application might have
>>>> >> >> >>> > benefitted
>>>> >> >> >>> > from a
>>>> >> >> >>> > more concrete outline of how she has been working within
>>>> >> >> >>> > PDPs -
>>>> >> >> >>> > or
>>>> >> >> >>> > tying PDP
>>>> >> >> >>> > experience as an observer with her policy writing". I very
>>>> >> >> >>> > much
>>>> >> >> >>> > appreciate
>>>> >> >> >>> > Dina's efforts regarding the Policy writing ad-hoc group she
>>>> >> >> >>> > tried
>>>> >> >> >>> > to
>>>> >> >> >>> > assemble, but I did not see it moving forward (and am not
>>>> >> >> >>> > implying
>>>> >> >> >>> > it
>>>> >> >> >>> > is her
>>>> >> >> >>> > fault either).
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > On the other hand, we have Ben who we approved on a previous
>>>> >> >> >>> > call
>>>> >> >> >>> > and
>>>> >> >> >>> > due to
>>>> >> >> >>> > personal reasons was not able to attend the meeting. Ben is
>>>> >> >> >>> > has
>>>> >> >> >>> > been
>>>> >> >> >>> > involved in the RDS and the RPMs working group and while we
>>>> >> >> >>> > thought
>>>> >> >> >>> > that the
>>>> >> >> >>> > Policy meeting would be a moment for him to make sense of
>>>> >> >> >>> > what
>>>> >> >> >>> > has
>>>> >> >> >>> > been
>>>> >> >> >>> > discussed in the calls, he was not able to attend. If I am
>>>> >> >> >>> > not
>>>> >> >> >>> > mistaken,
>>>> >> >> >>> > when we chatted about his situation in PR, and the idea of
>>>> >> >> >>> > re-considering
>>>> >> >> >>> > him for the subsequent call was at the table.
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > Given that I am very on the fence about the selection of the
>>>> >> >> >>> > second
>>>> >> >> >>> > candidate, and that the two candidates are from EU and AF, I
>>>> >> >> >>> > would
>>>> >> >> >>> > be
>>>> >> >> >>> > more
>>>> >> >> >>> > than happy to follow the advice from our EU and AF
>>>> >> >> >>> > representatives.
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > And please, lets decide soon on this matter, the more we
>>>> >> >> >>> > delay
>>>> >> >> >>> > the
>>>> >> >> >>> > decision
>>>> >> >> >>> > the harder it becomes to our funded members to find tickets
>>>> >> >> >>> > within
>>>> >> >> >>> > the
>>>> >> >> >>> > price
>>>> >> >> >>> > range. Barcelona is in less than two months!
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > best,
>>>> >> >> >>> > B.
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > Em ter, 28 de ago de 2018 às 10:15, Louise Marie Hurel
>>>> >> >> >>> > <louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Dear all,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> First, I'd like to kindly thank Joan for her inputs.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Second, I cast my first vote to Shahul. As my colleagues
>>>> >> >> >>> >> have
>>>> >> >> >>> >> already
>>>> >> >> >>> >> highlighted, he has been actively engaging in policy
>>>> >> >> >>> >> writing and
>>>> >> >> >>> >> shows
>>>> >> >> >>> >> promising development within our community -- he has shown
>>>> >> >> >>> >> consistent
>>>> >> >> >>> >> commitment and dedication. His application was clear,
>>>> >> >> >>> >> consistent
>>>> >> >> >>> >> and
>>>> >> >> >>> >> grounded. I think he would also benefit greatly from the
>>>> >> >> >>> >> opportunity
>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
>>>> >> >> >>> >> participate on-site and hopefully lay deeper grounds for
>>>> >> >> >>> >> further
>>>> >> >> >>> >> engagement
>>>> >> >> >>> >> within the NCUC.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Quite frankly, my second vote goes to either Benjamin or
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Dina.
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Let
>>>> >> >> >>> >> me
>>>> >> >> >>> >> take
>>>> >> >> >>> >> a few lines to explain why - given NPOC Chair's support for
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Dina. I
>>>> >> >> >>> >> have had
>>>> >> >> >>> >> the opportunity to work with her in the past two meetings
>>>> >> >> >>> >> at the
>>>> >> >> >>> >> onboarding
>>>> >> >> >>> >> program. She is committed and has engaged in drafting
>>>> >> >> >>> >> comments -
>>>> >> >> >>> >> a
>>>> >> >> >>> >> strong
>>>> >> >> >>> >> applicant. Although her application might have benefitted
>>>> >> >> >>> >> from a
>>>> >> >> >>> >> more
>>>> >> >> >>> >> concrete outline of how she has been working within PDPs -
>>>> >> >> >>> >> or
>>>> >> >> >>> >> tying
>>>> >> >> >>> >> PDP
>>>> >> >> >>> >> experience as an observer with her policy writing (a
>>>> >> >> >>> >> general way
>>>> >> >> >>> >> of
>>>> >> >> >>> >> gaining
>>>> >> >> >>> >> insights and perspectives from other stakeholder groups
>>>> >> >> >>> >> and/or
>>>> >> >> >>> >> maturity in
>>>> >> >> >>> >> navigating ICANN). On the other hand, I also think that we
>>>> >> >> >>> >> need
>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
>>>> >> >> >>> >> give
>>>> >> >> >>> >> space for new applicants, and that includes giving Ben an
>>>> >> >> >>> >> opportunity,
>>>> >> >> >>> >> as he
>>>> >> >> >>> >> has, unfortunately, not been able to attend the last
>>>> >> >> >>> >> meeting due
>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
>>>> >> >> >>> >> visa
>>>> >> >> >>> >> issues. He also submitted a good application, clearly
>>>> >> >> >>> >> demonstrating
>>>> >> >> >>> >> consistency in participating and following two PDPs and
>>>> >> >> >>> >> looking
>>>> >> >> >>> >> for
>>>> >> >> >>> >> mentorship. My only question here is that while he states
>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
>>>> >> >> >>> >> he
>>>> >> >> >>> >> would do
>>>> >> >> >>> >> his best to "keep along with the ICANN63 sessions
>>>> >> >> >>> >> especially
>>>> >> >> >>> >> those
>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
>>>> >> >> >>> >> concern the NCUC and NCSG" he didn't explain how the slot
>>>> >> >> >>> >> would
>>>> >> >> >>> >> also
>>>> >> >> >>> >> play
>>>> >> >> >>> >> into his volunteer work on NPOC's PC, in particular. I
>>>> >> >> >>> >> think
>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
>>>> >> >> >>> >> this
>>>> >> >> >>> >> might
>>>> >> >> >>> >> have been an opportunity for him to provide a more robust
>>>> >> >> >>> >> account
>>>> >> >> >>> >> of a
>>>> >> >> >>> >> grounded plan for engagement in this next meeting.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> As observed, I outlined both the pros and cons of their
>>>> >> >> >>> >> applications.
>>>> >> >> >>> >> I
>>>> >> >> >>> >> don't think there's a clear shot here and thus count on my
>>>> >> >> >>> >> peers
>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
>>>> >> >> >>> >> either
>>>> >> >> >>> >> provide further insights to their decision that might aid
>>>> >> >> >>> >> in the
>>>> >> >> >>> >> allocation
>>>> >> >> >>> >> of this slot or, rely on a majority of voters for one or
>>>> >> >> >>> >> the
>>>> >> >> >>> >> other.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Hope this provides a fair account of my decision.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Kind regards,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Louise Marie Hurel
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications
>>>> >> >> >>> >> (Data
>>>> >> >> >>> >> and
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Society)
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> Skype: louise.dias
>>>> >> >> >>> >> +44 (0) 7468 906327
>>>> >> >> >>> >> l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk
>>>> >> >> >>> >> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 18:43, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>>> >> >> >>> >> <raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> Thank you Joan for your clarification.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Joan Kerr
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> <joankerr at fbsc.org>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Hi Renata, All
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > NPOC is supporting Dina for a number of reasons.  She
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > has
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > been
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > working
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > hard
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > with the newly formed PC and has a lot of experience in
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > policy
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > and
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > processes.  NPOC feels Dina is the right choice and will
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > be
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > instrumental in
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > assisting with the policy going forward.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Thanks,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:23 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > <raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Dear Joan
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Please see inquiry from one of the NCUC EC reps.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Bruna Martins dos
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Santos
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Dear all,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > My first vote went to Shahul, and as I am still to
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > decide
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > who
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > will
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > get
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > the
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > second slot Im more prone to vote either o Ben or
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Farell,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > who
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > is
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > also a
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > NPOC
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > member I believe.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Renata, do you think that would be the case for
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > asking
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Joan
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > whether
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > or
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > not
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > she'd recommend a second name since Remmy withdrew
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > his
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > candidacy
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > ?
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > best,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > B.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Em dom, 26 de ago de 2018 às 21:59, Renata Aquino
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Ribeiro
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > <raquino at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Dear EC
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> It is time to announce the ICANN63 travel slots.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Please decide soon.
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Thanks
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > --
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > @boomartins
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > --
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Joan Kerr,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Entrepreneur, Artist, Humanitarian
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > T: +1 (416) 907-0783
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Skype: joankerr_fbsc
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > fbsc.org, www.fbsc.eco
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair: Victory Garden Leadership Implementation Team
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair, Sustainable Agriculture, Global Humanitarian
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Technology
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Conference
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair: IEEE Smart Villages Project, Sustainable
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Agriculture
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Working
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Group
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair: ICANN Not for Profit Operational Concerns
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Constituency
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Recipient of the United Nations Civil Society Award
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > (WSIS
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > 2004)
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Recipient, Region of Durham Community Partnership Award
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Advisor, IEEE Humanitarian Initiatives Committee
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Advisor, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network,
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > (CSAYN)
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Global
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Coordination Unit
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >> >>> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >> >>> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> >>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >> >>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >> >>> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > --
>>>> >> >> >>> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> >>> >
>>>> >> >> >>> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> >> >> >>> > @boomartins
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> --
>>>> >> >> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> >> >> >> @boomartins
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > --
>>>> >> >> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>>> >> >> > @boomartins
>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > --
>>>> >
>>>> > Elsa Saade
>>>> > Consultant
>>>> > Gulf Centre for Human Rights
>>>> > Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>>
>>> Elsa Saade
>>> Consultant
>>> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
>>> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>> @boomartins
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>