[NCUC-EC] ICANN staff comments on the bylaws

[Tatiana Tropina]

Hi Farzaneh and all.
I don't think we should agree to get the meeting where the comments are
"explained" to us. While am in general very cooperative, I think accepting
the offer to "explain" why someone would unilaterally rewrite our mission
and the membership rules is already too much. We have to send it back with
the note that the staff was supposed to do copy-editing of the text for the
purpose of consistency, not rewriting the provisions that constituency came
up with.
Farzy and I are involved in the AC/SO accountability WS2 and I was working
on membership data capture there. Yes!!! - other constituencies (BC, IPC)
*do* *have* membership, eligibility criteria and process of becoming a
member. Another argument why we shall not accept the document and just send
it back with a polite note that ICANN consultant overstepped the mandate
with regard to what can be edited.
Warm regards
Tanya


On 18 February 2017 at 04:37, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> EC,
>
> Please find attached ICANN staff comments on NCUC bylaws. I will arrange a
> meeting with Rob and staff but before doing that we need to go through the
> comments. We can do that within two weeks and then have a meeting with him
> and staff to explain the comments to us. Then we will discuss with Rob and
> staff and then discuss with our members, finalize and ask Rob to send it to
> Board.
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170218/abe4ad2b/attachment.html>