[NCUC-EC] URGENT: Proposed EC statement on transition and ICANN reforms

[Mueller, Milton L]

OK, looks like everyone agrees, so our illustrious NCUC chair should send it to the board ASAP.

--MM

From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 5:47 AM
To: Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com>
Cc: Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>; Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>; ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org; Stefania Milan <s.milan at uva.nl>; Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>; David Cake <dave at davecake.net>
Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] URGENT: Proposed EC statement on transition and ICANN reforms


Thanks Grace, it sounds we have support within EC to send the statement. I also see that Farzaneh suggetsing to send it by 30th September, I am thinking that we should take the opportunity of the momentum because the vote but looking forward to hear from others

Rafik

2016-09-29 18:12 GMT+09:00 Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com<mailto:ggithaiga at hotmail.com>>:

>

> +1
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>> on behalf of Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 5:55 AM
> To: Milton L Mueller
> Cc: Marilia Maciel; ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>; Stefania Milan; Stephanie Perrin; Edward Morris; David Cake
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] URGENT: Proposed EC statement on transition and ICANN reforms
>
>
> Hi Milton,
>
> Happy with this statememt.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2016 3:10 AM, "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:

>>

>>
>>
>> Dear EC members
>>
>> We have learned this evening that the IANA transition will not be blocked by the US Congress.
>>
>> As an immediate measure, I’d like for the NCUC EC to send the statement below to the ICANN board. I have copied our GNSO Councilors on this because I think they could help push this agenda.
>>
>> The words below may not be perfect but please let’s not get mired in word-smithing, we need to get this statement out quickly. If there are any significant errors or omissions fix them and send an amended version right out, otherwise just express your support (or lack of it).
>>
>>
>>
>> --MM
>>
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) Executive Committee (EC) was gratified to hear that the IANA transition will not be blocked by the U.S. Congress. We congratulate the board and the entire multistakeholder community on this news. Now that the contract with NTIA is sure to expire on September 30, the NCUC EC asks that the ICANN board immediately file and execute any and all procedures needed to implement the new bylaws, which put into place critical accountability reforms. We see quick action on this matter as a confidence-building measure and a signal of good faith to the global stakeholder community. We see delay any in taking those steps as raising risks to the successful completion of the transition. We hope the board and ICANN’s legal staff share these concerns and act accordingly.
>>
>>
>>
>> ##END
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec<http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20160929/609adeb6/attachment.html>