[NCUC-EC] Fwd: Event for NGOs at next ICANN meeting

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Bill,

Thanks for this update,
I sent yesterday the request for having the NCUC session in Saturday and
reception following the "tradition"
I guess that NPOC want to have the "NGO" session they planned for Dublin
meeting but they canceled in the last minute.
it also raises the question about the relation with PIR and being fairly
treated.
so yes Bill, I think you should respond here. btw I think Thomas is also a
newly NCSG member (and joined NPOC)
for replacement, I guess I can take over that role to work more on
strengthening the relationship with PIR, our main funder.

Best,

Rafik

2016-01-08 16:19 GMT+09:00 William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>:

> Hi folks
>
> You need to replace me as the PIR rep.  In the meanwhile I could reply
> saying that NCUC also does such events at every meeting, if it is your
> intent to do so in Marrakech.  Or anything else...I don’t know how you want
> to handle this fun stuff.
>
> Guidance?
>
> Bill
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Thomas Mackenzie <tom.mackenzie1 at gmail.com>
> *Subject: **Event for NGOs at next ICANN meeting*
> *Date: *January 7, 2016 at 15:55:44 GMT+1
> *To: *Kim Van Wyngaardt <kvanwyngaardt at pir.org>
> *Cc: *ORGAC <ORGAC at pir.org>, ngoac <ngoac at pir.org>
> *Resent-From: *<ORGAC at pir.org>
>
> Hello all,
>
> After our last call I posted a short message to the mailing list of the
> Non Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) group at ICANN about the possibility
> of a special event for NGOs during the next ICANN meeting in Marrakech. The
> idea was well received by several members including the chair, Klaus Stoll.
>
> The idea for ICANN would be to invite local NGOs that are active in the
> region (and beyond) to come and find out about DNS-related issues such as
> the roll-out of the new gTLD programme.
>
> For the Public Interest Registry such an event could be a good opportunity
> to discuss the .NGO / .ONG TLD.
>
> Klaus Stoll has put out a request for possible speakers at such an event.
> Do you have any recommendations?
>
> What are your thoughts about such an event? Perhaps the PIR could put
> forward a speaker or support the organisation of such an event in other
> ways.. What do you think?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> On 05 Jan 2016, at 18:19, Kim Van Wyngaardt <kvanwyngaardt at pir.org> wrote:
>
> Good morning/afternoon/evening all.
>
> Attached is a folder that holds the  notes from our Dec 18th call. This
> includes:
> -notes captured on the call
> -5 point pivot plan for .ngo/.ong
> -Dec 2 memo –breakout of questions asked *(please see the note in this
> document to respond to the content owners directly)*
> -Annex A
> -Annex B
> -Annex C
>
> We ask that you provide your input/responses to the questions by January
> 27.  I will send a reminder mid-month. I will also send an email, later
> this month, with options for our Q1 call. The agenda for the Q1 call will,
> in part, be driven by your input on the 3 questions asked.
>
> Thank you – and Happy New Year to all!
>
> Regards,
> Kim
>
> *Kim Van Wyngaardt*
> Senior Executive Administrator/Director of Board Relations
> Public Interest Registry
> Office: +1 703 889-5750 | Mobile: + 1 571 291-1455 |
> www.pir.org | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/PIRegistry> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/PIRegistry> | Instagram
> <http://instagram.com/PIRegistry> | YouTube
> <http://www.youtube.com/PIRegistry>
>
> *Confidentiality Note:*  Proprietary and confidential to Public Interest
> Registry.  If received in error, please inform sender and then delete
>
> <Dec 18 Call Output.zip>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20160108/9b7dd03b/attachment.html>