[NCUC-EC] Intersessional travel support applicants

Mon Dec 12 04:12:06 CET 2016

Hi all,

My vote for Matthew. And, as Renata said, if Matt can't make  it, I
strongly support the idea that the slot goes to James.

Cheers
Tanya

On 12 Dec 2016 03:59, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> My vote is for Matthew Shears as he indicated in his SOI his
> involvement with at least 4 working groups.
> If he can't make it, my choice would be James Gannon since he
> indicated he is CSG liason in his SOI.
>
> Best
>
> Renata
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:39 AM, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It was a hard choice to say the least. All deserve travel support but I
> > believe for this meeting, Matt Shears would be a great asset for the
> > discussions.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> >
> > 2016-12-10 12:47 GMT-05:00 Anna Loup <aloup at usc.edu>:
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> First, I wanted to say that I am glad we are working hard to make ,
> what I
> >> know will be, a great choice for the extra spot at the intersessional.
> As a
> >> summit between the leadership of the NCUC and NCSG, the Intersessional
> is a
> >> critical time when we can meet outside of the hectic ICANN meetings.
> For a
> >> young EC, this is especially important because the EC has a big year
> coming
> >> up and this will be a great time for us to learn how to best work with
> each
> >> other and find common ground.
> >>
> >> It will also provide us time to create rules for joint sessions
> (important
> >> for the NCPH board seat). Finally, this will be a critical time for the
> EC
> >> to meet with staff. As someone who got my start through the initial
> >> iterations of the ICANN student-internship program, I saw the power of
> the
> >> intersessional meetings first -hand in giving EC members time to meet
> with
> >> staff outside of ICANN meetings. They are a critical part of our work
> and as
> >> a young EC it will be a great time for us to build relationships.
> >>
> >> Finally, I too think this is a good list of people and am glad we
> included
> >> everyone. I want to put my support behind Matt because of his extensive
> role
> >> as NCSG PC, his work on CCWG-accountability, and his work in Hyderabad
> >> (which he didn't mention in his SOI). His work at Hyderabad will be very
> >> helpful to this new EC as he already is up to date on council
> conversations.
> >> This will certainly help the new EC transition smoothly.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Anna
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Tatiana Tropina
> >> <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Agree that mathematical average won't work in this case, we gave
> neither
> >>> enough time no defined criteria. I will come up with my choice between
> Matt
> >>> and James tomorrow.
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Tanya
> >>>
> >>> On 10 Dec 2016 11:28, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Renata,
> >>>>
> >>>> Since we really don't have much time for this one we need to act
> >>>> quickly. Since we have not agreed on a broad set of criteria I am not
> sure
> >>>> if mathematical average would work. But how about you give it a try
> and tell
> >>>> others if they support people you have come up with. But we need to
> decide
> >>>> by Monday the latest.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10 December 2016 at 10:01, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
> raquino at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is very hard.
> >>>>> Indeed all candidates are good.
> >>>>> We need to discuss criteria for these things asap.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was thinking maybe a shorlist (order of priority to go), we compare
> >>>>> each others short list and do a mathematical average
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Tatiana Tropina
> >>>>> <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > All candidates are good. But with the focus of the meeting and the
> >>>>> > involvement in current policy work, for me it's a hard choice
> between
> >>>>> > Matthew and James. I wish we had two travel slots. I will take time
> >>>>> > to think
> >>>>> > till tomorrow.
> >>>>> > Cheers
> >>>>> > Tanya
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On 9 Dec 2016 17:12, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Dear all,
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> we need to decide on who should receive travel support to go to
> >>>>> >> Iceland.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> I have attached the name and SOI of those that sent their request.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> I cannot find Wolfgang's statement of interest. Will send to you
> >>>>> >> later if
> >>>>> >> he has sent one before the deadline. But attached is the compiled
> >>>>> >> SOIs.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Ayden sent his late. We cannot accept late applications, but I
> >>>>> >> wanted to
> >>>>> >> attach his SOI considering that the deadline was too short.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> We need to decide by Monday the latest.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Best
> >>>>> >> --
> >>>>> >> Farzaneh
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Farzaneh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>
> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.
> ncuc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgIGaQ&c=
> clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_
> Qrtek1FqfDQOL5aEw&m=E0DySsF-JbzW130dN-uLRVMdSRE6H1HDV0NZPLX_bVw&s=
> 4nwEZkDtMtPCC7E__JumOHUy2bPpD_BxgrJAbzP9R4Q&e=
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Masters in Public Diplomacy '16
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20161212/cbad7da3/attachment.html>