[NCUC-EC] Fwd: For Review and Feedback -- Draft NCPH Meeting Agenda

[William Drake]

Hi

FYI. Any inputs on the agenda etc to pass along do let me know.

Cheers

Bill

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Subject: Re: For Review and Feedback -- Draft NCPH Meeting Agenda
> From: William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
> Date: November 15, 2014 at 3:35:27 PM GMT+1
> Cc: Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>, Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com>, "rudi.vansnick at isoc.be" <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>, "lori.schulman at ascd.org" <lori.schulman at ascd.org>, Kristina Rosette <krosette at cov.com>, "Metalitz, Steven" <met at msk.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye at kontemporary.net>, Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>, Benedetta Rossi <benedetta.rossi at icann.org>, Stefania Milan <Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu>, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
> To: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>
> 
> Hello
> 
> Thanks Rob for moving us along.  Some initial reactions:
> 
> The overall schedule maps well with what we discussed.
> 
> Re: the Day 1 morning NCPH sessions, perhaps one option would be to lead with one on broader changes/conditions in the ICANN environment on which non-contracted would have broadly similar concerns, e.g. expansion/diversification of contracted parties and possible GNSO implications; and then do the second one on our intra-house dynamics and cooperation, e.g. conduct of elections etc.  In other words, lead off with shared stuff to get everyone acclimated and then ease into items on which we’ve struggled a bit?
> 
> Re: the Day 2 afternoon NCPH sessions, it sounded on the call like we all agreed on Accountability as a substantive discussion topic.  If I understood Steve correctly CSG would be less interested in talking about IANA stewardship in this context.  If so, perhaps EWG?  Or would we want to discuss the GNSO Review and structural issues in more detail?
> 
> I suppose the four NCPH sessions could be ordered a number of ways. We also could for ex hold the intra-house discussion for one of the Day 2 slots, after folks have been spending time together and are warmed up etc…
> 
> Re: lunches,  on the first day, maybe we’d want more casual conversation opportunities? A speaker on the second day might be good, a beltway luminary of some sort?  
> 
> Steve suggested expanding the head count a little so a few local community members could join.  As discussed, alternative considerations would be keeping the group size reasonably conversational and not being asymmetric.  Could we compromise on adding two heads per house?
> 
> I had a drink with Markus the other night and he didn’t know about the meeting, but he checked his schedule and is available.  I agree it’d be good to have him there so folks who aren’t could get acquainted. 
> 
> Also, going forward, two process requests:
> 
> *Please include my NCUC EC colleague Stefania Milan on the Cc, Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu <mailto:Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu>.  She is copied here.
> 
> *Please send to me at only one address, william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>, I don’t need copies of every message in both my accounts.
> 
> thanks much
> 
> Bill
> 
>> On Nov 15, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org <mailto:robert.hoggarth at icann.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> Attached please find a draft "strawman" agenda structure (Version "v1") for the January NCPH meeting.  Per our discussion this week,  please share and discuss it with your individual communities as you see fit.  If our previous 2013 effort is a good guide, this is likely to be the first of several agenda drafts before we reach a final version.
>> 
>> Please provide as many comments/reactions/edit suggestions/etc. as possible via email over the course of the next week. 
>> 
>> Benedetta will be circulating a Doodle poll to select the date for the next planning call, and I hope we can make some on-line progress prior to that next meeting.
>> 
>> Please note that I am now including Maryam Bakoshi and Brenda Brewer on the cc list so that they can be ready to assist you in prepping your individual meeting agendas during the course of the events that week.
>> 
>> Believe it or not, with one major exception, our planning timetable is still pretty consistent with the timing of the 2013 meeting planning effort. The one area where we REALLY need your help is to provide as many traveler/delegate names as soon as  possible so that we can make sure that all intended travelers/delegates have reasonable travel schedules and any visas they may need to get into the U.S. for the meeting. Please provide that info to me as soon as possible so that we can maximize the use of our support resources for the meeting.
>> 
>> Thank you all for your help and support of this planning effort!
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rob 
>> <Agenda - NCPH InterSessional (v1- 14Nov2014).docx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20141119/38c5cdef/attachment.html>