[NCUC-EC] Fwd: How to get involved with NCUC

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Thu Feb 20 14:58:02 CET 2014


Hi Bill,

are you going to send call to 1net about the NCUC conference or to join
NCUC as members?
about being involved in GNSO and WG, Avri created 2 pages in wiki and we
have also the regular session by Mickey about WG, process, procedures and
the content is available and can be used .

Best,

Rafik

2014-02-20 18:16 GMT+09:00 William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>:

> We really need to do something about the lack of a membership affairs team
> coordinator.  This is precisely the sort of thing the team should be able
> to handle, providing explanation of how to join and then get plugged into
> NCUC/GNSO work.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Kelsey Suemnicht <kelsey.suemnicht at icann.org>
> *Subject: **How to get involved with NCUC*
> *Date: *February 18, 2014 at 10:49:46 PM GMT+1
> *To: *"william.drake at uzh.ch" <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I'm putting together an alert for the 1net email list on how to
> participate, get involved, and contribute feedback to NCUC — anything in
> particular you would advise I include?
>
> Thanks,
> Kelsey
>
> *Kelsey Suemnicht*
> Global Communications Coordinator
> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> kelsey.suemnicht at icann.org
> +1 (202) 615-7181
>
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2014, at 10:14 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I had a gent named Kris Seeburn contact me out of the blue two weeks ago
> and say he’d be willing to do the Membership team.  I’d never heard of him,
> he’s not spoken on the members list, but he sent his CV, teaches at the
> University of Technology, Mauritius, ISOC member. Seems a nice and smart
> guy, precisely the sort of member someone should be in reaching to to get
> him engaged, but whether he’s well positioned to lead that task himself
> given lack of historical involvement I don’t know.  I replied that normally
> the idea of the teams was that they’d be coordinated by members of the EC
> and comprise both EC members and regular members in order to create a
> bridge between the two and broaden engagement in the performance of key
> intraorganizational tasks.  As EC members, the coordinators would be able
> to regularly report to the EC and ensure coordination; plus any significant
> ‘decisions’ should be done by the EC since they are the elected
> representatives.  But as that’s not happening, maybe we should try a
> regular member, in which case I suppose I should do an open call
> for expressions of interest so nobody feels like this was handled in an
> insider sort of way.  He was ok with that.
>
> So: last call.  Nobody on the EC can take this on?  I should write to
> members and ask for EOIs?
>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20140220/c7d07cea/attachment.html>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list