[NCUC-EC] EC meeting?

[Edward Morris]

Thanks Bill.


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:35 PM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have written again to Rob seeking clarification on the likelihood that
> staff/SIC would be able to review/approve a bylaws update in November.
>  Until we have a clear answer either way it's not obvious we should be
> pressing everyone to crash on this in September-October.  I will get back
> to you about scheduling an EC meeting when we have some idea what's what.
>  It'll also take some time to get the procedural stuff agreed with staff,
> since other constituency and stakeholder group Ex. Comms are less
> formalized with regard to transcripts and such.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> meeting at 13:00GMT looks ok for me,and hopefully avoiding some WG
> calls.wednesday seems OK too.
> for decisions, we don't need necessarily transcripts but at least having
> minutes and clearly stating when we reach decision. shall we follow
> robert's rules :)?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2013/9/1 William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> So I'm back on the block here in Geneva and getting dug out from summer
>> and set up for the autumn push, on various fronts.  One of these is of
>> course getting NCUC work rebooted.  We've had some foundational discussion
>> of bylaws revision on the list, now we need to start putting things in
>> motion.  I remain concerned about the timeline and what's going to be
>> operationally feasible given the SIC's need to review and sign off (and
>> potentially, ask for xyz tweaks which we then submit and wait some more to
>> hear on), and I've written to Rob Hoggarth asking for some clarification.
>>  But regardless of our "due date," we need to get started and see how far
>> we can move.  September-October are not great months at my end with a new
>> semester, the IGF, etc., but I'll try to help things along.  Movement will
>> definitely require engagement from the folks who expressed the strongest
>> concerns about the bylaws and a prior desire to lead their revision.
>>
>> We also have other operational stuff to deal with, e.g. I'm already
>> getting bugged by staff about Buenos Aires planning, there's the budget
>> allocations (including ancillary IGF funding—here too awaiting staff
>> clarification), etc.
>>
>> To get us moving, I suggest we organize a EC meeting (effectively picking
>> up where the Durban EC meeting ended).  Would Wednesday or Friday work?  If
>> so I'll put up a doodle.  As to how to meet—if we really want the whole
>> ICANN package with adobe and phone bridge and all that I'd have to request
>> it in accordance with our Tool Kit application.   Alternatively, we could
>> try something less formalized and staff-dependent, e.g. a Google Groups
>> meeting.   I'd need a tad of training on the latter as I've never done one
>> and am interested to learn.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20130902/ef04ba57/attachment.html>