[NCUC-EC] EC meeting?

Wilson Abigaba abigabaw at gmail.com
Mon Sep 2 10:02:52 CEST 2013


I am also for the meeting and can be available more less any time which is
favorable for the Europeans as we are almost in the same timezone.

I can set up the Google Hangout if ICANN's meeting facilities aren't
available.

regards,
Wilson

Kind Regards,
Wilson


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris100 at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> So I'm back on the block here in Geneva and getting dug out from summer
> and set up for the autumn push, on various fronts.  One of these is of
> course getting NCUC work rebooted.  We've had some foundational discussion
> of bylaws revision on the list, now we need to start putting things in
> motion.  I remain concerned about the timeline and what's going to be
> operationally feasible given the SIC's need to review and sign off (and
> potentially, ask for xyz tweaks which we then submit and wait some more to
> hear on)
>
>
> Given that the Board SIC meets less than monthly that is a serious problem.
>
>
>
> and I've written to Rob Hoggarth asking for some clarification.  But
> regardless of our "due date," we need to get started and see how far we can
> move.  September-October are not great months at my end with a new
> semester, the IGF, etc., but I'll try to help things along.  Movement will
> definitely require engagement from the folks who expressed the strongest
> concerns about the bylaws and a prior desire to lead their revision.
>
>
> The next few weeks are tight for me, but I have reasonably good
> availability from September 22nd through Buenos Aires and a desire to get
> this done.
>
>
>
> To get us moving, I suggest we organize a EC meeting (effectively picking
> up where the Durban EC meeting ended).  Would Wednesday or Friday work?
>
>
> I'm off to South America ( Santiago, BA, São Paulo) on Sunday for a little
> over a week, but with the exception of the 12th, 14th and 18th ( concert
> days)  I'll be available to meet whenever it is best for everybody else.
>
>
>
> If so I'll put up a doodle.  As to how to meet—if we really want the whole
> ICANN package with adobe and phone bridge and all that I'd have to request
> it in accordance with our Tool Kit application.   Alternatively, we could
> try something less formalized and staff-dependent, e.g. a Google Groups
> meeting.   I'd need a tad of training on the latter as I've never done one
> and am interested to learn.
>
>
> I think the toolkit will certainly be needed for Bylaws meetings. For the
> EC I'm happy to go along with what everyone else prefers. The team meetings
> I ran on Skype were a bit of a technical disaster. Wilson's e-team meeting
> on Google Hangout went better (although I recall we lost Sarah for much of
> the meeting). If we are going that route perhaps Wilson can provide the
> expertise - he taught me enough about Hangout to allow me to participate in
> the aforementioned meeting.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   **********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (w), wjdrake at gmail.com (h),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20130902/a0eabbbd/attachment.html>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list