[Ec-ncuc] NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP

[Brenden Kuerbis]

Suggested edits attached.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> Perfect!
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 9:52 AM
> > To: Milton L Mueller; EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org
> > Cc: Avri org>; Robin Gross; William Drake; Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU; Wendy
> > Seltzer; Rafik Dammak
> > Subject: Re: NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP
> >
> > Forgot to attach :)
> >
> > KK
> >
> > From: Konstantinos Komaitis
> > <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:50:54 +0100
> > To: Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>, "EC-
> > NCUC at ipjustice.org<mailto:EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org>" <ec-
> > ncuc at ipjustice.org<mailto:ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org>>
> > Cc: "Avri org>" <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>, Robin Gross
> > <robin at ipjustice.org<mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>, William Drake
> > <william.drake at uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>>,
> > "Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU>"
> > <Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU>>, Wendy Seltzer
> > <wendy at seltzer.com<mailto:wendy at seltzer.com>>, Rafik Dammak
> > <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>>
> > Subject: Re: NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP
> >
> > Shorter, amended version.
> >
> > KK
> >
> > From: Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:24:48 +0100
> > To: Konstantinos Komaitis
> > <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>>, Milton L
> > Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>, "EC-
> > NCUC at ipjustice.org<mailto:EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org>" <ec-
> > ncuc at ipjustice.org<mailto:ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org>>
> > Cc: "Avri org>" <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>, Robin Gross
> > <robin at ipjustice.org<mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>, William Drake
> > <william.drake at uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>>,
> > "Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU>"
> > <Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU>>, Wendy Seltzer
> > <wendy at seltzer.com<mailto:wendy at seltzer.com>>, Rafik Dammak
> > <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>>
> > Subject: Re: NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP
> >
> > Up to you, but I don't think it burns any bridges to be simple & direct
> > about what the letter is about. The risk otherwise is that they just
> > don't read it.
> >
> > Milton Mueller
> > Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> >
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: Konstantinos Komaitis
> > <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>>
> > To: Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu<mailto:mueller at syr.edu>>, "EC-
> > NCUC at ipjustice.org<mailto:EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org>" <ec-
> > ncuc at ipjustice.org<mailto:ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org>>
> > Cc: "Avri org>" <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>, Robin Gross
> > <robin at ipjustice.org<mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>, William Drake
> > <william.drake at uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>>,
> > "Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU>"
> > <Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU>>, Wendy Seltzer
> > <wendy at seltzer.com<mailto:wendy at seltzer.com>>, Rafik Dammak
> > <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>>
> > Sent: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 13:15:51 GMT+00:00
> > Subject: Re: NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP
> >
> > At this stage, I would prefer if we were to send a polite letter to the
> > GAC instead of cutting bridges before we even started our dialogue with
> > them.I could cut it shorter and insist on the point of the GAC has
> > consulted with the IPC only - my understanding is that the Ry's and Rr's
> > have not been consulted on this letter - am I wrong?
> >
> > KK
> >
> > From: Milton L Mueller
> > <mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU><mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:01:51 +0100
> > To: Konstantinos Komaitis
> > <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk><mailto:k.komait
> > is at strath.ac.uk>>, "EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org<mailto:EC-
> > NCUC at ipjustice.org><mailto:EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org>" <ec-
> > ncuc at ipjustice.org<mailto:ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org><mailto:ec-
> > ncuc at ipjustice.org>>
> > Cc: "Avri org>"
> > <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org><mailto:avri at acm.org>>, Robin Gross
> > <robin at ipjustice.org<mailto:robin at ipjustice.org><mailto:robin at ipjustice.
> > org>>, William Drake
> > <william.drake at uzh.ch<mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch><mailto:william.drake@
> > uzh.ch>>,
> > "Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU><mailto:Mary.Wong at LA
> > W.UNH.EDU>"
> > <Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU><mailto:Mary.Wong at LA
> > W.UNH.EDU>>, Wendy Seltzer
> > <wendy at seltzer.com<mailto:wendy at seltzer.com><mailto:wendy at seltzer.com>>,
> > Rafik Dammak
> > <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM><mailto:rafik.damm
> > ak at GMAIL.COM>>
> > Subject: RE: NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP
> >
> > I think the letter is too polite, too generic and too long. I think it
> > should say, more simply, that the GAC does not seem to have consulted
> > with stakeholders holding different viewpoints about the UDRP and so we
> > are sending it our views.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 7:15 AM
> > To: EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org<mailto:EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org><mailto:EC-
> > NCUC at ipjustice.org>
> > Cc: Avri org>; Robin Gross; William Drake;
> > Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU<mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW.UNH.EDU><mailto:Mary.Wong at LAW
> > .UNH.EDU>; Wendy Seltzer; Milton L Mueller; Rafik Dammak
> > Subject: NCUC letter to the GAC, RE UDRP Dear all, I've drafted a cover
> > letter to send to the GAC in relation to the UDRP, attaching at the end
> > NCUC's comments during the public period. Given the time pressure to
> > send this out to the GAC before the Dakar meeting, I don't think there
> > is time for the whole list to review it. I am asking therefore the NCUC
> > EC to tell me whether they agree on sending this to the GAC. As you may
> > know, the GAC sent a statement to the GNSO requesting that the UDRP
> > should not be reviewed; this statement was drafted by the IPC so we need
> > to respond.
> > Please edit and/or make any additions that you feel are necessary. I
> > would like to send this to Heather by the end of the week so they can
> > read it before the GNSO meet with them in Dakar.
> > Many thanks
> > KK
> > --
> > Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
> > Senior Lecturer in Law,
> > Director of LLM in Information Technology and Telems. Law, Director of
> > Postgraduate Instructional Courses, ICANN NCUC Chair University of
> > Strathclyde, Graham Hills Bld.
> > 50 George Street,
> > Glasgow, G1 1BA,
> > UK
> > tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
> > email:
> > k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk><mailto:k.komaiti
> > s at strath.ac.uk>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ec-ncuc mailing list
> Ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ec-ncuc/attachments/20110926/744f2ced/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCUC Letter to the GAC, re UDRP(short).docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 73093 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ec-ncuc/attachments/20110926/744f2ced/attachment-0001.docx>