[Ec-ncuc] [NCSG-Discuss] listservs

[Alex Gakuru]

Hi,

In addition to supporting David, Milton's and your position on this one, I
am generally a minimalist on the number of mailing lists, especially for
more active members also subscribed to several other Working Groups, etc.
It may be insightful for one/all calling for additional lists to indicate
how many policy development process lists they would be on, just to compare
and contrast e-loads?

Alex

2011/11/17 Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>

> I would also like to hear what the other members of the EC have to say
> about this issue. as I said, I am not in favour of creating separate lists
> - it will be difficult to follow, confusing for people and it will
> ultimately take discussions such as the issue of the USOC away from the
> whole membership. But, I would like to hear the views of the other members
> as well.
>
> KK
>
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
>
> Senior Lecturer,
> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
> Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
> University of Strathclyde,
> The Law School,
> Graham Hills building,
> 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
> UK
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
>
> http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
> Selected publications:
> http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
> Website: www.komaitis.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ec-ncuc-bounces at ipjustice.org [mailto:ec-ncuc-bounces at ipjustice.org]
> On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
> Sent: ??????, 17 ????????? 2011 5:55 ??
> To: EC-NCUC at ipjustice.org (ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org)
> Subject: [Ec-ncuc] FW: [NCSG-Discuss] listservs
>
> David expressed my sentiments exactly.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
> > David Cake
> > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:57 AM
> > To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> > Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] listservs
> >
> >       Just to address Alains comments about our 'dirty laundry' - I agree
> > with the general NCUC feeling that a separate NCUC list for policy
> > discussion would probably be a mistake, I think an NCUC list for NCUC
> > internal procedural issues would be the optimum - but I'm loathe to
> > create a separate email list for what is usually a very small number
> > of messages, especially given the confusion that might result between
> > the two (as soon as two separate lists existed, I would foresee a
> > regular quantity of messages to the wrong list). Suggestions for how
> > better to manage the issue welcome.
> >       Regards
> >               David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ec-ncuc mailing list
> Ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ec-ncuc mailing list
> Ec-ncuc at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ec-ncuc/attachments/20111117/79e0057e/attachment.html>