[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: ICANN76 Plenary Session Topic Feedback

[Benjamin Akinmoyeje]

Thank you all for your feedback, it appears some of your suggestions were
reiterated across the different communities too, especially in support of
the Subpro ODP.
 Here is the new proposal on moving forward with the Subpro discussion by
the planning committee.

Dear all,



Thank you for the input we’ve received so far on the proposed SubPro
sessions for ICANN76.



Given the various viewpoints, we would like to propose the following
arrangement which we believe will reduce the impact to the schedule while
maintaining at least one session on this timely and important topic.



   1. Hold one of the proposed SubPro session during Prep Week; and
   2. Schedule one SubPro session during ICANN76
      - Use one of the previously identified slots at the start of the
      meeting, to facilitate further dialogue and discussions during the meeting
      - No restrictions: other sessions may run in conflict with the session
      - As with all other open sessions, there will be full remote
      participation services, including recordings and a transcript for
      post-meeting access.



*Please let us know if this a suitable alternative to our previous proposal*.
We understand that some groups also have internal discussions on SubPro
planned during the meeting. Therefore, your input on the timing for this
proposed session will also be appreciated so that we do not overlap with
sessions on the same topic.





Kind regards,

Benjamin







On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 12:59 AM Akinremi Peter Taiwo <compsoftnet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Ben and all,
>
> I would go with option 1 and 3.
> It would be good to know the ODP progress and keep eyes on the
> multistakeholder model. We might need to watch out for surprise practices
> and trends of this model.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 8:58 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Kathy,
>> Thank you for the questions.
>>  Unfortunately, the time has passed for us to suggest new topics, we can
>> only support any of the ones listed below.
>>
>> Concerning the GPI Framework pilot, there was a session for it during *Virtual
>> ICANN73  * https://73.schedule.icann.org/meetings/N79ABoMmic8ihMi8n
>>
>> We can reach out for  an update on* GPI Framework pilot*  from Avri
>> Doria for an update or session with our constituency.
>>
>> Is there a possibility to get  us to support one or two of these topics?
>> This is time sensitive, actually today is the deadline for our feedback.
>>
>> 1. Unfinished Business and the Role of the ODP (ALAC)
>>
>> 2. The Interplay Between ICANN Bylaws and National Legislation (GAC)
>>
>> 3. Looking Towards WSIS+20: How Can We Improve the Multistakeholder
>>    Model for the Future? (GAC)
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 7:10 PM Kathy Kleiman <kathy at dnrc.tech> wrote:
>>
>>> Benjamin,
>>>
>>> Can we suggest another topic:  The Global Public Interest Framework:
>>> What is the status of the GPI Framework Pilot and how can we learn more and
>>> provide input as a Community?
>>>
>>> See e.g,
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit
>>>
>>> Best and tx,
>>>
>>> Kathy
>>> On 1/4/2023 1:52 AM, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear NCUC members,
>>> Good day and I hope you are doing well. Apologies for crossposting.
>>> Please see the email below and cast your vote or show support for ICANN76
>>> Plenary Topic Proposals
>>> <https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/plenary-session-topic-proposals-76> of
>>> interest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The topics are as follows:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Unfinished Business and the Role of the ODP (ALAC)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. The Interplay Between ICANN Bylaws and National Legislation (GAC)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Looking Towards WSIS+20: How Can We Improve the Multistakeholder
>>>    Model for the Future? (GAC)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Please read the detailed proposals
>>> at https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/plenary-session-topic-proposals-76
>>> <https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/plenary-session-topic-proposals-76>.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please find the Plenary Topic Review form here
>>> <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ICANN76_FeedbackSurvey>.  Your timely
>>> response is highly appreciated
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Benjamin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kathy Kleiman
>>> President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
> ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ ------- ------
> ------ -------  ------ ------
> *Certified Salesforce Administrator | Data Protection Specialist | IT
> Auditor *
> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com
> ___________________________________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20230113/4c43763b/attachment.htm>